Why Is the Set S Not a Basis for R^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter will
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
Click For Summary
The set S is not a basis for R^3 in both cases due to linear dependence. In the first example, S includes the zero vector, which inherently makes it dependent. Additionally, the remaining vectors do not span R^3 as they do not provide enough dimensions. In the second example, having four vectors leads to linear dependence, exceeding the required three for a basis. Thus, both sets fail to meet the criteria for being a basis for R^3.
will
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


4) explain why S is not a basis for R^3
(a) S={(1,2,-1),(0,0,0),(1,0,1)}
(b) explain why S is not a basis for R^3
S={(2,4,5),(-1,3,6),(7,7,9),(-4,2,-4)}


Homework Equations

all proofs

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)**The set S is a set with the 0 vector, (0,0,0). Such a set is always dependant and can therefore never be a basis for R3.

The set without the zero vector S={(1,2,-1),(1,0,1} is also no basis for R3, it contains less vectors than the dimension of R3 (which is 3).

(b)**To have a bas you need only 3 vectors by having 4 that makes this system linearly dependent and there for it doesn't represent a base.. to make it a base one has to be eliminated and check if they have linear independency


"" is there a better more elegant answer, by justifying an Axion or a theorem" my teacher is so hard" thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ahh, teachers :)

Okay, search for what "rank" means if you already don't know, then relate the number of linearly independent vectors in S to the rank of S (smaller, larger, equal...). This would be the elegant way of explaining it :)
 
will said:
"" is there a better more elegant answer, by justifying an Axion or a theorem" my teacher is so hard" thanks guys

The answers are elegant enough, it's just using definitions of "basis", "span", etc.
 
Did your teacher ask for a "more elegant" way? In each case you have said that the set of vectors is not a basis because it is not linearly independent. That's showing that the definition of "base" is not satisfied and is plenty "elegant".
(Of course, you do not need the other comments on "The set without the zero vector" and " to make it a base one has to be eliminated and check if they have linear independency" because those questions were not asked.)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K