Linear Differential Equation: Dropping Absolute Value Bars

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the justification for dropping absolute value bars when calculating the integrating factor for the linear differential equation (x+1)dy/dx + xy = e^(-x). The key point is that while absolute values are necessary for the natural logarithm to extend its domain, when exponentiating the result, the absolute value can be omitted since e^(ln|x|) simplifies to |x|. The concern about losing solutions is mitigated by recognizing that the integrating factor derived will still be valid across the relevant domain of the differential equation. The participants acknowledge the nuances of the integral's domain and the implications of the asymptote at x=0. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the balance between mathematical rigor and practical application in solving differential equations.
sweetreason
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm doing some practice problems, and with the help of my solutions manual and wolfram alpha I've worked out a solution to

(x+1)\frac{dy}{dx} +xy = e^{-x}

However, I don't understand why we can drop the absolute value bars when we calculate the integrating factor:

e^{\int \frac{x}{x+1} dx} = e^{x- \ln|x+1|} = \frac{e^x}{x+1}

I understand that if we don't drop the absolute value bars in the last step, certain terms won't cancel when we multiply our equation by this integrating factor. But why are we justified in doing so? Usually we say something about how x > 0, but this isn't an initial value problem and x isn't specified to be in any particular interval. Can you please explain why we are justified in dropping the absolute value bars? How do we know that we aren't losing solutions when we do this?

(For a full solution to this see

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(x+1)dy/dx++xy+=e^(-x) )

and click "show steps" under "Differential Equation Solutions".

Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to think of the reason why the absolute value bars are there in the first place. And then try to reason out why they would be dropped when the natural logarithm is eliminated.
 
Well, I know the absolute value bars are there to extend the domain of the natural log function, which normally only has domain (0, +infinity). I guess what you're implying is that since e^{\ln x} = e^{\ln|x|} this implies x = |x|, or x \geq 0? Is that right?
 
I think It has something to do with the fact the the indefinite integral of 1/t is defined from 1 to x (because there is an asymptote at x=0), but if you are considering e raised to the power of that integral, I don't think there is a need to take into account the original complication. I'm really not sure now; you are asking a really good question. I'll look into it some more, but hopefully by then someone else will offer you a better explanation.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K