MHB Linear Map, T^p(x)=0, Show Linear Independence

Click For Summary
In a complex vector space V of dimension n, if a linear map T satisfies T^p(x) = 0 and T^(p-1)(x) ≠ 0, then the vectors x, Tx, T^2x, ..., T^(p-1)x are linearly independent. The discussion clarifies that the professor's statement about the existence of such an x aligns with the theorem being applied. To prove linear independence, one assumes a linear combination of these vectors equals zero and derives contradictions by applying T repeatedly. This leads to the conclusion that if any coefficient in the combination is non-zero, it results in a contradiction regarding the properties of T applied to x. Thus, the assertion of linear independence holds true under the given conditions.
joypav
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Suppose V is a complex vector space of dimension n, and T is a linear map from V to V. Suppose $x \in V$, and p is a positive integer such that $T^p(x)=0$ but $T^{p-1}(x)\ne0$.

Show that $x, Tx, T^2x, ... , T^{p-1}x$ are linearly independent.During class my professor said it was "a fact" that

If V is a complex vector space of dimension n, and T is a linear map from V to V such that $T^n(x)=0$ but $T^{n-1}(x)\ne0$,
then there exists an x such that $x, Tx, T^2x, ... , T^{n-1}x$ are linearly independent.

Is this what I should use for this problem? If so, do I need to know how I can determine such an x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you assert your professor said and the theorem you state are not quite the same. You say your professor said "If V is a complex vector space of dimension n, and T is a linear map from V to V such that T^n(x)= 0 but T^{n-1}(x) is not 0" then there exist x such that ...". If the conclusion is "there exist x" then what is that x in the hypothesis?

In any case, given that, for some linear transformation there exist vector x and integer n such that T^n(x)= 0 but that T^{n-1}(x)\ne 0 (from which it follows that T^m(x)\ne 0 for any m< n), the suppose to the contrary that x, T(x), T^2(x), ..., T^{n-1}(x) are NOT linearly independent. Then there exist \{a_n\}, not all 0, such that a_0x+ a_1T(x)+\cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{n-2}T^{n-2}(x)+ a_{n-}T^{n-1}(x)= 0. Apply T to both sides: a_0T(x)+ a_1T^2(x)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{n-1}T^{n-1}(x)+ a_nT^n(x)= a_0T(x)+ a_1T^2(x)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{n-1}T^{n-1}(x)= 0.

Applying T n-1 times, and repeatedly using the fact that T^n(x)= 0, we arrive at a_0T^{n-1}(x)= 0. If a_0\ne 0 it follows that T^{n-1}(x)= 0, a contradiction. If a_0= 0, we only need to apply T n-2 times to arrive at a_1T^{n-1}(x)= 0, etc.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K