Linear Transformation and Linear dependence - Proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the linear transformation T: Rn to Rm maps two linearly independent vectors {u, v} into a linearly dependent set {T(u), T(v)}, leading to the conclusion that the equation T(x) = 0 has a nontrivial solution. The proof involves manipulating the equation T(c1u + c2v) = T(0) and demonstrating that if either c1 or c2 is non-zero, then T(x) = 0 must hold true for some nontrivial x. The key equations used include T(c1u) + T(c2v) = T(0) and c1T(u) + c2T(v) = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations in vector spaces
  • Knowledge of linear independence and dependence concepts
  • Familiarity with the properties of linear equations
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and manipulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in detail
  • Explore the implications of the Rank-Nullity Theorem
  • Learn about the relationship between linear independence and the kernel of a transformation
  • Investigate examples of linear transformations and their effects on vector sets
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians interested in vector space theory, and educators teaching concepts of linear transformations and their properties.

1nonly
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let T:Rn to Rm be a linear transformation that maps two linearly independents vectors {u,v} into a linearly dependent set {t(u),T(v)}. Show that the equation T(x)=0 has a nontrivial solution.

Homework Equations



c1u1 + c2v2 = 0 where c1,c2 = 0

T(c1u1 + c2v2) = T(0) where c1 or c2 /= 0

The Attempt at a Solution



Since we know:

T(c1u1 + c2v2) = T(0) where c1 or c2 /= 0
T(c1u1) + T(c2v2) = T(0)
c1T(u1) + c2T(v2) = T(0)
c1T(u1) + c2T(v2) = 0 (c1 or c2 /= 0)

T(x) = 0 has trivial solution
c1T(x) = 0 where c1 /= 0

I'm not sure how to connect those two ideas or if there even relevant to the solution proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what your last expression is supposed to mean, but the block of four equations is already the proof. Maybe it is easier to see it, if you read it backwards.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K