Linear Transformations - formula

Click For Summary
To find the matrix A for the linear transformation T, the equations T([1,2,-3]) = [1,0,4,2], T([3,5,2]) = [-8,3,0,1], and T([-2,-3,-4]) = [0,2,-1,0] are used. By expressing these transformations in matrix form, the equation A multiplied by a matrix of input vectors results in a matrix of output vectors. This approach is valid due to the properties of matrix multiplication, which allows for the combination of multiple transformations into a single matrix equation. The discussion concludes with an affirmation of understanding the concept of combined matrices in linear transformations.
notmuch
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am given the following:

T([1,2,-3]) = [1,0,4,2]
T([3,5,2]) = [-8,3,0,1]
T([-2,-3,-4]) = [0,2,-1,0]

And of course I know that:

T(x) = Ax

and I want to find the matrix A.

So, from the individual equations, I construct:

A[1, 2, -3] = [1, 0, 4, 2] (please forgive, these are actually col. vectors)

I do something similar for the other two, and come up with the equation below. I can solve this equation to obtain (the correct) matrix A, but I can't seem to find an explanation for why it is possible to throw it all together into "combined matrices." Could anyone help? Thanks!

<br /> A\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 3 &amp; -2\\<br /> 2 &amp; 5 &amp; -3\\<br /> -3 &amp; 2 &amp; -4\end{pmatrix} = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; -8 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 2\\<br /> 4 &amp; 0 &amp; -1\\<br /> 2 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\end{pmatrix} <br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the last matrix is equivalent to the three individual equations. This just follows from matrix multiplication. Schematically, if the v_n's are column vectors, you can write:

A\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> v_1 &amp; v_2 &amp; v_3 &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \end{array}\right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> Av_1 &amp; Av_2 &amp; Av_3 &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \end{array}\right)
 
Got it. Thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K