Linearizing Doppler Shift Function: How to Expand and Take Linear Terms?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around linearizing the Doppler shift function for light, specifically focusing on the mathematical expansion of the function. Participants are exploring the Taylor series expansion and its application to the given equation involving the speed of light and relative velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply a Taylor series expansion but expresses confusion regarding the choice of the expansion point. Other participants suggest alternative forms of the Doppler shift function and provide insights into the expansion process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering different perspectives on the function's form and expansion. Some guidance has been provided regarding the series expansion, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or interpretation of the function.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the problem is a special case, indicating that the standard form of the Doppler shift function may not apply directly, which raises questions about the assumptions being made in the discussion.

mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Well this is a physics related question but I think putting it in math is best. I am trying to linearize the doppler shift function of light. I know that means to expand it and take the linear terms but don't really know what to do. I was guessing a taylor series expansion but f[x]=f[a]+f'[a](x-a) has me confused as I am not sure what to use as a, as 0 doesn't work too well.
The equation is [tex]v0 \frac{1+\frac{v}{c}} {1-\frac{v}{c}}[/tex] where v0 is on the order of 10^10, c is 3*10^8, and v is around 45.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this will help:

http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~krybakov/teaching_files/math_econ/problem_sets/ps4.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shouldn't it be [tex]f_0\sqrt{ \frac{1+\frac{v}{c}} {1-\frac{v}{c}}}[/tex] ?

Check-out the Doppler Effect page at www.scienceworld.com[/url], near the bottom they give such an expansion (cf. [url=http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/RelativisticRedshift.html] Their Red Shift page[/URL] for more detail.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In case I'm wrong, (I'm no physicist) try this:

[tex]v_0 \frac{1+\frac{v}{c}} {1-\frac{v}{c}} = v_0 \left( 1+\frac{v}{c} \right) \frac{1} {1-\frac{v}{c}} = v_0 \left( 1+\frac{v}{c} \right) \left[ 1+ \frac{v}{c} + \left( \frac{v}{c}\right) ^2 + \cdots \right] = v_0 \left[ 1+ 2\frac{v}{c} + 2\left( \frac{v}{c}\right) ^2 + \cdots \right] \approx v_0 \left( 1+ 2\frac{v}{c} \right)[/tex]

for [tex]v\ll c[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Thanks, just incase anyone is wondering it is a special case(should have said that) so it doesn't have the square root.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K