1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Linera Transformation Questions

  1. Jul 21, 2008 #1
    Hey everyone,

    Let T: W -> V be a linear transformation and T(w_1) = v_1 for some w_1 \in W and v_1 \in V. Now set S = {w \in W | T(w) = T(w_1) = v_1}. Prove that S = w_1 + Kernel(T) = {w_1 + a | a \in Ker(T)}.

    Let w \in S. T(w_1) = T(w) = T(w) + T(a) = T(w_1) + T(a) = T(w_1 + a) = v_1, where a \in Ker(T).


    S_1 = {w \in W | T(w) = T(w_1) = v_1}; S_2 = {w_1 + a | a \in Ker(t)}

    S_1 = S_2 = S and we're done. Correct?
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 21, 2008 #2

    All elements of S = S_1 constitute elements whose images are v_1, and the elements of S_2 constitute elements whose images are v_1. Now how can I prove they're no preimages in S_1 that aren't present in S_2 and vice versa?
  4. Jul 21, 2008 #3


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    This looks ok, though the steps appear to be out of order.

    You mean how do you prove there isn't any [tex]\vec{u} \in W \ | \ T(\vec{u}) \neq \vec{v_1}[/tex]? Didn't you just do that with the above? Note that by definition all such [tex]\vec{u} \ \mbox{can be expressed as} \ \vec{w_1} + \vec{a} [/tex]. What does that tell you?
  5. Jul 21, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If x is any member of S then T(x)= T(w_1)= w by definition of S. Now, let a= x- w_1 so that x= w_1+ a. It is easy to prove T(a)= 0 (do that yourself) and so x is in S_2.

    Conversely, if x is any member of S_2, then x= w_1+ a by definition of S_2. But then T(x)= T(w_1+ a)= T(w_1)+ T(a)= ? (and so x is in S).
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook