Linus Pauling's "General Chemistry" Book- Is it Up to Date?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennington
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Linus Pauling's "General Chemistry" is a foundational text for undergraduate chemistry, though its publication date raises concerns about its current relevance. While some users praise its depth and insight, others note its lack of modern explanations, particularly in quantum chemistry and recent advancements like nanotechnology. Alternatives such as "Chemistry: The Central Science" by Brown et al. and "Principles of Chemistry" by Munowitz are recommended for a more contemporary understanding. Overall, Pauling's book remains a valuable resource but should not be the sole text for chemistry education.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic chemistry concepts
  • Familiarity with quantum chemistry fundamentals
  • Knowledge of modern chemistry advancements, such as nanotechnology
  • Experience with reading and interpreting scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Chemistry: The Central Science" by Brown et al. for a modern perspective
  • Explore "Principles of Chemistry" by Munowitz for explicit explanations of concepts
  • Study recent developments in quantum chemistry and nanotechnology
  • Read reviews and comparisons of classic vs. modern chemistry textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and chemistry enthusiasts seeking a comprehensive understanding of foundational and modern chemistry concepts will benefit from this discussion.

bennington
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I was in Barnes and Noble and few weeks ago searching through the science section, and I found a small book by Linus Pauling called General Chemistry. Alhtough it does not look like a normal textbook, it is supposed to contain all of the information that an undergrad needs to understand chemistry. I would like to purchase this to understand more about chemical processes, but I am concerned about the date that this was published. Do any of you own the book, and if you do, is it up to date? Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This is only my opinion, so listen to others also.

I read Pauling's chemical bond book after taking general chemistry and organic chemistry. I loved it but probably could not have understood it before taking those courses.

My wife took general chemistry with Pauling's textbook (in the 60s) and absolutely hated the book. She found it incomprehensible; there simply was not enough explanation. I don't know if later editions added any more explanations.
 
The thing is that I saw a lot of positive reviews of it on Amazon, so I am now really uncertain. How about a book I found through PF - General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications by Ralph H. Petrucci, William S. Harwood, and Geoffrey Herring?
 
Sorry, I don't know any of the modern chemistry texts.
 
TVP45 said:
Sorry, I don't know any of the modern chemistry texts.

still, thanks for helping me.
 
bennington said:
I was in Barnes and Noble and few weeks ago searching through the science section, and I found a small book by Linus Pauling called General Chemistry. Alhtough it does not look like a normal textbook, it is supposed to contain all of the information that an undergrad needs to understand chemistry. I would like to purchase this to understand more about chemical processes, but I am concerned about the date that this was published. Do any of you own the book, and if you do, is it up to date? Thanks.

I bought his book on Quantum Mechanics about a year ago. It was quite old also. I find it interesting that B&N would stock such a book. Usually you have to go to used bookstores for such items.
 
Linus Pauling's book is excellent. It is the best gen chem book I know, but I think it is better after having had some education in the ideas of chemistry already.

Brown et al's Chemistry: The Central Science is a great modern General Chemistry text. However, I think Munowitz's Principles of Chemistry is best. This is also new, but it isn't formatted in the same style as most texts. Munowitz explicitly states the things most gen. chem. books only say implicitly, which I would think would make it a great book to start with.

General Chemistry hasn't changed a ton since Pauling's book came out. The biggest deficit is probably in quantum chemistry. Nanotechnology and new allotropes of carbon (nanotubes, fullerenes) have come about since the book was published too. I guess having an intro to quantum chemistry before a pchem class is pretty important, so I would say Pauling's book is not completely sufficient. But I still think that anyone interested in chemistry should read Pauling's book at some point.
 
Last edited:
Someone once said "Read the masters, not their pupils". This is sometimes true. Not always. I remember Fermi's book on thermodynamics as totally uninspired and no different from other ornery books on the subject. Though maybe these copied it. Dirac's books look like they could only be read by someone who doesn't need to.

But there are some examples on the other side. That give you the insight, the underlying spirit, motivation and even simplicity of things.

Read the reviews at Amazon. It sounds like it should not be the only Chemistry book you ever read, unless you only ever read one, but that it will help you a lot to read the others you need. At starting $6.50 used and $13 new and could sell on you are not risking that much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K