Liquid Nitrogen Injection Underground Last Defense

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and implications of using liquid nitrogen injection as a cooling method for potentially molten reactor cores in the event of containment breaches at a nuclear facility. Participants explore theoretical approaches, practical challenges, and historical comparisons, focusing on both the technical and logistical aspects of such a solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that injecting liquid nitrogen underground could cool molten reactor cores in the event of containment breaches, suggesting it as a prudent precaution.
  • Others argue that such breaches are unlikely and that the logistics of liquid nitrogen injection are impractical due to the required cryogenic vessels and the vast quantities of liquid nitrogen needed.
  • A participant questions the feasibility of constructing circum containment around the reactors, noting complications related to the plant's bedrock foundations.
  • Concerns are raised about the unique challenges posed by the Fukushima plant's elevation compared to Chernobyl, where different cooling methods were employed.
  • One participant provides calculations indicating the immense amount of liquid nitrogen required to manage decay heat from the reactors, suggesting that the demand would exceed available resources.
  • Another participant discusses the long-term management of spent fuel and the potential for alternative nuclear technologies that could reduce high-level waste, although these solutions have not been widely implemented.
  • Some participants express frustration over the lack of transparent information from authorities regarding the situation and the potential environmental impacts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of liquid nitrogen injection, with no consensus reached on its practicality or the likelihood of containment breaches. There are competing perspectives on the historical context of nuclear disaster management and the effectiveness of proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in available information and the challenges of accurately assessing the situation due to governmental restrictions. There are unresolved questions regarding the long-term management of nuclear waste and the effectiveness of various cooling strategies.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in nuclear engineering, environmental science, disaster management, and those following developments in nuclear safety and waste management technologies.

  • #31
QuantumPion said:
To provide jobs for geologists, bureaucrats, and political contributions for politicians. :rolleyes:
and to advocate those liquid metal cooled fast neutron reactors which have certain fuel economy advantages, but are otherwise a nightmare. The idea may be neat, and the material issues might be solvable, in theory, but in practice - there is a lot more experience handling hot water than any other liquid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K