List of common misconceptions about relativity?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on addressing common misconceptions about relativity in a community college physics course. The instructor plans to facilitate group discussions among students about specific questions related to relativity, such as the nature of light's momentum and the implications of relativistic speeds. Participants suggest additional questions and misconceptions, including the nature of black holes, time dilation, and the concept of absolute motion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding relativity beyond just high-speed scenarios, highlighting foundational concepts that can confuse students. Overall, the aim is to enhance student comprehension of relativity through collaborative exploration of these topics.
  • #31
rjbeery said:
For a myth, how about "SR has proven the aether does not exist." I'm not advocating for aether, but there's a big difference between proving that something cannot exist in a theory versus merely acknowledging that it isn't necessary in that theory.
As I see this is rather complicated question. Obviously it's a myth. But at the time people where probably hung on the idea of finding preferred frame. So such a myth would ban useless discussions.
But nowadays I would say that such a myth promotes kind of magical thinking. That's because dimensional modelling is very powerful tool for consistency checking but that myth kind of prevents using it. But that's my viewpoint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
And another thing that I considered quite interesting (somewhat related to relativistic interpretation of aberration). This is actually a paradox kind of thing but it of course is related to some misconception (if you have it).

Let's say we have situation like this:
2vcdl3k.jpg

Observers "1" and "2" are observing box with an "A" printed on it's side. We view this situation in rest frame of the box and first observer. Second observer is in motion in that frame. Neither observer can see the "A" on the side of the box when both observers are side by side.

Now let's change to rest frame of second observer:
mcgoxw.jpg

The box and first observer is in motion in that frame. Because the box is in motion and light doesn't get to observer instantly second observer see the box in it's past position. So should the "A" be visible for him?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
38K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K