List of plenary talks at Loops '07 conference

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the plenary talks scheduled for the Loops '07 conference, focusing on topics related to quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity, and associated theoretical frameworks. Participants share details about the registration process, the list of speakers, and abstracts of their talks, which cover a range of foundational and phenomenological questions in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note the registration deadlines for the conference and highlight the inclusion of string theory as a topic.
  • Abhay Ashtekar's talk will summarize insights from recent models in loop quantum gravity, suggesting new strategies for understanding full quantum gravity.
  • Martin Bojowald discusses loop quantum cosmology and its implications for effective theory, including corrections to Einstein's equations relevant for cosmological observations.
  • John F. Donoghue reviews the use of effective field theory in understanding quantum predictions of general relativity.
  • Lucien Hardy introduces the causaloid formalism as a framework for reconciling the probabilistic nature of quantum theory with the deterministic structure of general relativity.
  • James Hartle explores the need for a generalized quantum mechanics framework suitable for fluctuating spacetime geometries.
  • Sabine Hossenfelder presents phenomenological models of quantum gravity, discussing their observable consequences and implications for the standard model.
  • Daniele Oriti describes group field theories and their potential role in unifying various approaches to quantum gravity and spacetime emergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of viewpoints on the topics covered in the plenary talks, with no consensus reached on the implications or interpretations of the theories discussed. The discussion remains open with multiple competing views on the nature of quantum gravity and its foundational aspects.

Contextual Notes

The abstracts provided reflect ongoing research and theoretical developments, with some assumptions and interpretations that may not be universally accepted. The discussions are based on preliminary information and may evolve as the conference approaches.

  • #31
had to say it:




Tyger Tyger. burning bright,
In the forests of the night:
What immortal hand or eye,
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies.
Burnt the fire of thine eyes!
On what wings dare he aspire!
What the hand, dare sieze the fire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
That is a wonderful poem.

I am very hopeful for this E8 gauge theory, and it's looking really good, but one also has to keep in mind that things that look good at first may just not work. Is there a Blake poem about enumerating chickens? ;)

I certainly will be immersing myself in E8 over the next year -- and I'll keep you posted. It will be fun. JB has a more recent writeup related to E8 here:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/octonions/node19.html
 
Last edited:
  • #33
garrett said:
I certainly will be immersing myself in E8 over the next year -- and I'll keep you posted. It will be fun. JB has a more recent writeup related to E8 here:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/octonions/node19.html

It is amusing how we keep tripping with these group structures. If they happen to be useful after all, will we be able to keep telling that superstring theory was wrong?
 
  • #34
arivero said:
If they happen to be useful after all, will we be able to keep telling that superstring theory was wrong?

The usefulness of E8 is a completely separate issue to the correctness (or not) of physical observables in string theory.
 
  • #35
Quick post from Mexico:

Wow, I've had more good physics conversations with more people in the past two days than I have in the past ten years. I think my brain's going to explode.

My talk went well -- the E8 idea has attracted a lot of attention. Some quotes to amuse you:
"This is very interesting." -- L.S.
"It's not bull****." -- S.H.
That's actually high praise. ;)

The LQG community is very friendly -- such great people. There are a myriad of ideas branching out from this group in all directions, but all are working towards the same thing and connecting their ideas in fascinating ways. It is a very fertile community.

I think about half of PI is here -- it must be a fantastic place.

Must sleep now. Buenes Noches.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
garrett said:
The LQG community is very friendly -- such great people. There are a myriad of ideas branching out from this group in all directions, but all are working towards the same thing and connecting their ideas in fascinating ways. It is a very fertile community.

I think about half of PI is here -- it must be a fantastic place.

Hi Garrett,

That's exactly the impression I have, even though based on my "very far far far away" geographical location. :smile:

Christine
 
  • #37
garrett said:
"This is very interesting." -- L.S.
"It's not bull****." -- S.H.

I imagine L.S. is Lee Smolin.

I don't imagine S.H. is Stephen Hawking. Who is it? :confused:
 
  • #38
john baez said:
I imagine L.S. is Lee Smolin.

I don't imagine S.H. is Stephen Hawking. Who is it? :confused:

My immediate guess was Bee Hossenfelder
She's posted around here some, as "Hossi"
and you probably bumped into her when visiting Perimeter.
phenomenologist, outspoken, funny, intolerant of fluff
what Garrett said is right, her comment WAS high praise
 
Last edited:
  • #39
garrett said:
My talk went well -- .

Congratulations!
 
  • #40
Speaking of "S.H." or Bee Hossenfelder, she has a nice report from the Loops conference (topic of this thread), which just ended.

http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/06/impressions-from-loops-07.html

Bee has pictures of SOME POSTERS ON THIS FORUM! There is a snapshot she took of Garrett and also, i think, of fh.
Also at least one other who has come here sometimes.
 
Last edited:
  • #41
Yidun Wan's blog has more pictures from Morelia
http://www.wanyidun.com/blog_r2u/?p=131

Garrett has given us a lot of firsthand reporting on the talks and people there

William Donnelly and Alejandro Satz, who both gave papers, have blogs and we may be getting news from them.

I should list places to check

Bee
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/06/impressions-from-loops-07.html
Garrett
http://deferentialgeometry.org/
Alejandro*
http://realityconditions.blogspot.com/
William*
http://williamdonnelly.blogspot.com/
Yidun
http://www.wanyidun.com/blog_r2u/?p=131

*Alejandro Satz and William Donnelly have been doing other stuff and haven't posted on blog much lately, but we might eventually see something so those links are included. Anybody think of someone I've missed?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K