Ln(9/4) + ln (16/9) - ln (3/1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter 939
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ln
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
939
Messages
110
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



If you have, for example, 2 + 4 - 1, you can get the answer (5), by doing both:

= 2 + (4 - 1)

and,

= (2 + 4) - 1


But the same logic does not work with logs: to get the right answer (4/3) here you must do:

=(ln(9/4) + ln (16/9)) - ln (3/1)

and NOT:

ln(9/4) + (ln (16/9) - ln (3/1))


Why exactly is this so?



Homework Equations



ln (9/4) + ln (16/9) - ln (3/1)

2. Attempt at a solution

(ln (9/4) + ln (16/9)) - ln (3/1)

= (ln (4) - ln (3))
= ln (4/3) = correct

(ln (9/4) + (ln (16/9)) - ln (3/1))

= ln (9/4) + ln (16/27)
= ln (144/108) = wrong
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
939 said:
= ln (9/4) + ln (16/27)
= ln (144/108) = wrong

What does that reduce to in lowest terms?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
scurty said:
What does that reduce to in lowest terms?

Ahhhh, such a stupid mistake. Thanks.
 
939 said:
Ahhhh, such a stupid mistake. Thanks.

It happens to everybody, you're welcome.

Rather than simplify at the end you can do it earlier by recognizing that 9 divides into 27 evenly and 4 divides into 16 evenly: $$\frac{9}{4} \cdot \frac{16}{27} = \frac{16}{4} \cdot \frac{9}{27}$$.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person