Load Balancing: Can't understand the summation term

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concept of summation in the context of load balancing, specifically addressing the term "Summation of (j tj)." Participants confirm that the summation operation involves adding terms rather than multiplying them. The correct interpretation is represented as ##\sum_{j=1}^{m}{(t_j)} = t_1 + t_2 + t_3 + ...##, where 'j' serves as an index similar to a "for" loop in programming. The omission of limits in the original text is noted as a point of confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of summation notation in mathematics
  • Familiarity with programming concepts, particularly loops
  • Basic knowledge of load balancing principles
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions in technical documentation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research mathematical summation notation and its applications in algorithms
  • Explore load balancing techniques and their performance metrics
  • Learn about programming constructs like loops and indexing in various programming languages
  • Study the implications of processing time in distributed systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, software developers, system architects, and anyone involved in optimizing load balancing and processing time in distributed systems.

zak100
Messages
462
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
Hi,
I am trying to understand a summation term related to load balancing
I can’t understand the term Summation of (j tj). Are we multiplying j and tj. But the text is not talking about multiplying, it says”Total processing time
cant understand summation term.jpg


Somebody please guide me.

Zulfi.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
the summation just sums the terms.

##\sum_{n=0}^{10}{(2n+1)} = 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + ... + 21##

in your case:

##\sum_{j=1}^{m}{(t_j)} = t_1 + t_2 + t_3 + ...##

but they left out the limits of j=1 to m.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zak100
Hi,
Thanks for your response.

You mean its not multiplying j with ##t_j##
##\sum_j t_j ##

Thanks.

God bless you.

Zulfi.
 
The j is saying that is the index the summation indexes over rather like a “for”loop in programming j is the “for” loop index.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K