Locally Compact Hausdorff Space is Regular

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sammycaps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Regular Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Every locally compact Hausdorff space is regular, as established through the proof involving 1-point compactification. The discussion references Munkres' theorem (32.3), which states that every compact Hausdorff space is normal, and subsequently, a normal space is regular. The confusion arises regarding the definition of normal spaces and whether they require 1-point sets to be closed, a stipulation that Munkres appears to enforce. However, it is clarified that singletons are always closed in a Hausdorff space, supporting the conclusion that locally compact Hausdorff spaces are indeed regular.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of locally compact Hausdorff spaces
  • Familiarity with Munkres' topology, specifically theorems 32.3 and definitions on page 195
  • Knowledge of compact and normal spaces in topology
  • Concept of 1-point compactification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Munkres' theorem 32.3 on compact Hausdorff spaces
  • Research the definitions and properties of normal spaces in various topology texts
  • Examine the concept of 1-point compactification in greater detail
  • Explore the relationship between regular and normal spaces in Hausdorff contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those studying topology, graduate students in mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties of compact and Hausdorff spaces.

sammycaps
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
So, I'm working a bit through munkres and I came across this problem

Show that every locally compact Hausdorff space is regular.

So, I think I've solved it, but there is something confusing me. I initially said that if X is locally compact Hausdorff, it has a 1-point compactification, Y, which is compact Hausdorff. Then, by some theorem in Munkres (32.3), every compact Hausdorff space is normal. Then again by Munkres, (page 195), a normal space is regular, and a subspace of a regular space is regular, so that X is regular.

Now, my confusion here is that Munkres defines normal and regular only when 1-point sets are closed. It is not entirely clear to me that this is true for a compact Hausdorff space. Is it? Because if so, then I see that normal implies regular and the proof is done.

Even without this though, I can see that any compact Hausdorff space is regular purely from the definition of compact and Hausdorff (at least for the definition of regular not using the fact that 1-point sets are closed), and so a subspace of Y, namely X, must be regular.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Singletons are always closed in a Hausdorff space. Try to prove it if you haven't.
 
O, that was dumb.

In general though, do people reguire that normal spaces have 1 point closed sets so that normal implies regularity? It seems that that is what Munkres does.
 
sammycaps said:
O, that was dumb.

In general though, do people reguire that normal spaces have 1 point closed sets so that normal implies regularity? It seems that that is what Munkres does.

It depends on the author. Many authors do not define normal spaces to have closed singletons. Other authors do require it. Munkres seems to require it.
 
I wonder then, which of his theorems depend on it, since its not always clear. I think most of his comparisons between regular spaces and normal spaces include the use of a Hausdorff space (well-ordered sets in the order topology, compact Hausdorff sets, metrizable spaces), so it all seems consistent, but I don't know for sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K