Noncompact locally compact Hausdorff continuous mapping

In summary: Its been a long day.Yes, that's right! And no problem, it's always nice to work through things together and learn something new. :)In summary, we need to show that the map f* extends to a continuous map f*: X* ---> Y* if and only if f is proper. This can be done by considering the one-point compactifications of X and Y and using the definition of properness and the Hausdorff property to show that the inverse image of open sets in Y* containing the extra point is open in X*.
  • #1
PsychonautQQ
784
10
Self studying here :D...

Let X and Y be noncompact, locally compact hausdorff spaces and let f: X--->Y be a map between them; show that this map extends to a continuous map f* : X* ---> Y* iff f is proper, where X* and Y* are the one point compactifications of X and Y.

(A continuous map is said to be proper if the inverse image of each compact subset of Y is compact in X).

I have already shown that X* is a compact hausdorff space and that X is open and dense in X* and has the subspace topology.This one might take me awhile to work all the way through, I've meditated on the matter a bit but would appreciate some help getting my foot in the door.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Since f* is an extension, the only choice we have to make is what point in Y* to map ##\infty_X## (the extra point that compactifies X) to. The most natural choice seems to be to map it to ##\infty_Y##. I suggest investigating such a map to see if it is continuous. We will need to use the continuity and properness of f in the process. The only tricky bit will be trying to prove that the inverse images of open sets in ##Y^*## containing ##\infty_Y## are open.

If that doesn't work, we'll need to consider the case where ##f^*(\infty_X)=y\neq \infty_Y##. My gut tells me we won't have to consider that case, but my gut is sometimes wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
  • #3
let ##U##be an open neighborhood of ##\infty_Y##. Then ##Y^*-U## will be compact in Y, call it ##C_y##.

The inverse image of ##C_y## will be some compact set in X, call it ##C_x##. We know this to be true because the map is proper.

Hmm... am i any closer to showing that the preimage of ##U## is open in ##X^*##? I will think about how I can bring the locally compact and Hausdorff properties into the solution.

So ##C_x = X^*-R## for some neighborhood of ##R## of ##\infty_X## in ##X^*##?

So ##Y^*-U## is a compact set in ##Y## and therefore closed in ##Y##. Perhaps we can use this to show that ##U## is open in ##Y^*## and likewise that ##R## is open in ##X^*## and that R is the preimage of U?
I did not use local compactness anywhere yet. There must be some flaws in my logic or holes to be filled in.

edit: so it turns out a continuous proper map between two locally compact Hausdorff spaces is a closed map. That will probably help. I suppose it's also worth noting that a compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed.

Also... any tips?? :D
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Using the definition of openness in ##Y^*##, we can write ##U=U'\cup\{\infty_Y\}##, where ##U'## is open in ##Y##. Using that and our definition of ##f^*##, that should enable us to say something more specific about the inverse image of ##C_y##.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
  • #5
Man, I'm certain there is something obvious that I'm not seeing... But why can we write ##U=U'\cup\{\infty_Y\}## where ##U'## is open in ##Y##?
 
  • #6
PsychonautQQ said:
Man, I'm certain there is something obvious that I'm not seeing... But why can we write ##U=U'\cup\{\infty_Y\}## where ##U'## is open in ##Y##?
In the one-point compactification, any open set containing the additional point ##\infty_Y## must be of that form. See this definition.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
  • #7
That seems to be under
Alexandroff one-point compactification,

that does not seem to be the same as the one point compactification i am using, where the open sets of ##X^*## are the sets that are open in ##X## or sets in V in ##X^*## such that ##X^* - V## is compact in X.

edit: are these definitions equivalent or am I mistaken somewhere in my definition or understanding?
 
  • #8
They are the same. Since ##X## is Hausdorff, the compactness of ##X^*-V## implies it is closed in X. So that ##X-(X^*-V)=U'=V-\infty_X## is open in ##X##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
  • #9
andrewkirk said:
They are the same. Since ##X## is Hausdorff, the compactness of ##X^*-V## implies it is closed in X. So that ##X-(X^*-V)=U'=V-\infty_Y## is open in ##X##.
Oh, wow, i am a bit slow sometimes :-/
 
  • #10
andrewkirk said:
They are the same. Since ##X## is Hausdorff, the compactness of ##X^*-V## implies it is closed in X. So that ##X-(X^*-V)=U'=V-\infty_Y## is open in ##X##.
##X - (X^* - V) = V - \infty_Y##

Can you show me why this is ?
 
  • #11
Use subscript 'c' to denote complement in ##X^*##. Then, using de Morgan's laws repeatedly:

\begin{align*}
\\X-(X^*-V)
&=X \cap ((X\cup\{\infty_X\} )\cap V^c)^c
\\&=X \cap ((X \cup\{\infty_X\} )^c \cup V)
\\&=X \cap ((X^c \cap\{\infty_X\}^c ) \cup V)
\\&=X \cap ((\{\infty_X\} \cap\{\infty_X\}^c ) \cup V)
\\&=X \cap (\emptyset \cup V)
\\&=X \cap V
\\&=V - \{\infty_X\}
%\\&=X \cap (X^c \cup \{\infty_X\}\cup V)
%\\&=X \cap V
%\\&= X-\\
\end{align*}

That ##\infty_Y## in post 8 should have been ##\infty_X##. I've gone back and corrected it.
 
  • #12
So ##preimage of f^*(C_y) = preimage of f^*(Y^* - (U' union {\infty_Y)})##

Hmm, i still don't see what i am supposed to see.
 
  • #13
What we need to prove is that, for U open in Y*, ##f^{*-1}(U)## is open in X*. For U open in Y* we know (from Hausdorff) that ##Y^*-U## is compact in Y* so that (by properness) ##f^{*-1}(Y^*-U)=f^{*-1}(Y^*)-f^{*-1}(U)## is compact in X*.

Can you reason from there to the sought conclusion, using what we know about compactness and the Haussdorf property?
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
  • #14
andrewkirk said:
What we need to prove is that, for U open in Y*, ##f^{*-1}(U)## is open in X*. For U open in Y* we know (from Hausdorff) that ##Y^*-U## is compact in Y* so that (by properness) ##f^{*-1}(Y^*-U)=f^{*-1}(Y^*)-f^{*-1}(U)## is compact in X*.

Can you reason from there to the sought conclusion, using what we know about compactness and the Haussdorf property?

Oh, so it takes the complement of an open set, which is compact, to another compact set that is therefore closed, so it's complete, the preimage of U, must be open.

something like that? Thanks for being patient with me btw :D
 
  • #15
Yes that's it.
 

1. What is a "noncompact locally compact Hausdorff continuous mapping"?

A "noncompact locally compact Hausdorff continuous mapping" is a mathematical concept used in topology to describe a function that maps points from one topological space to another. It is noncompact, meaning that the image of the function is not a compact set. However, it is locally compact, meaning that each point in the domain has a compact neighborhood. It is also Hausdorff, meaning that any two distinct points in the range have disjoint neighborhoods.

2. What is the difference between a compact and a noncompact mapping?

The main difference between a compact and a noncompact mapping is the behavior of the image under the function. A compact mapping has a finite or bounded image, while a noncompact mapping does not. In other words, a compact mapping "compresses" the points in the domain to a finite or bounded set in the range, while a noncompact mapping can "stretch" or "spread out" the points in the domain to an infinite set in the range.

3. Why is the notion of local compactness important in continuous mapping?

Local compactness is an important property in continuous mapping because it guarantees the existence of compact neighborhoods around each point in the domain. This allows for the construction of continuous functions that preserve important topological properties, such as connectedness and compactness, between two topological spaces. It also ensures that the function is well-behaved and does not have any "jumps" or "discontinuities."

4. Can a continuous mapping be both noncompact and locally compact?

Yes, it is possible for a continuous mapping to be both noncompact and locally compact. This can occur when the domain and range have different topologies, such that the function maps compact sets in the domain to noncompact sets in the range. In this case, the mapping would be noncompact, but each point in the domain would still have a compact neighborhood, making it locally compact.

5. What are some real-world applications of noncompact locally compact Hausdorff continuous mapping?

Noncompact locally compact Hausdorff continuous mapping has several applications in various fields, such as physics, engineering, and economics. In physics, it is used to describe the behavior of continuous systems, such as fluid flow and electromagnetic fields. In engineering, it is used to model the behavior of systems with continuous inputs and outputs, such as control systems and signal processing. In economics, it is used to study the equilibrium of markets and the behavior of economic systems over time.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Math POTW for University Students
Replies
4
Views
749
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
780
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
831
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
32
Views
4K
Back
Top