Locking Mechanism reducing load on locking pin

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a locking mechanism that reduces the load on the actuator by changing the orientation of the locking pin. By positioning the actuator perpendicular to the force, the locking pin absorbs the bending forces, minimizing the risk of accidental unlocking or damage to the actuator. Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of a single linear bearing and the importance of having proper support on both sides of the load. Recommendations include increasing the radius of the lock-point to lessen the force on the mechanism and ensuring the geometry prevents any cam action that could lead to unlocking. The proposed design can work effectively if the shapes and materials are carefully considered and maintained.
Heral89
Messages
21
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I wanted to make a locking mechanism. The problem was the forces on the actuator (solenoid in this case) where getting too high
In image 2, the wedge shaped lock plate was exerting too much force on the actuator, which would unlock and could potentially break the actuator. Or I would have needed a very big and strong (more force) actuator.

In image 1, since the actuator is now perpendicular to any potential force, the actuator does not need to apply a lot of force (except weight of the locking pin/shaft and frictions).
But most importantly, the locking pin takes all the force. In this case it's perpendicular to the axis of the locking pin, hence no direct axial load on the locking pin, actuator shaft, hence chances of actuator accidentally unlocking or breaking away is less.
All the bending force will be reacted to by the locking pin which is supported by the linear bearing.
Of course there is a coupling needed to couple the actuator shaft with the actual lock pin.

My query is will this work the way it is intended to. It sounds too simple to work.
 

Attachments

  • lockimage 1.jpg
    lockimage 1.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 637
  • lockimage 2.jpg
    lockimage 2.jpg
    34.2 KB · Views: 601
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's a bit hard to picture this without understanding more about what you are trying to lock. It seems you have a shaft that is constrained only to rotate, and you want to use a solenoid actuator to hold this shaft in place... your idea is to have the pin that the solenoid pushes interrupt the rotation, and you think you can avoid or reduce stress on the actuator by changing the orientation of the pin. And you think it will be much better to have the pin parallel to the axis of the rotating shaft instead of perpendicular to it?

You are right to avoid any torque on the solenoidal actuator, but I'm not convinced that your linear bearing can do this. It would be best if you could have a bearing on both sides of the load and have the pin stick far enough to go through both bearings. If possible, I recommend increasing the radius of the lock-point relative to the rotation axis of the shaft you are locking. This will reduce the force on the locking mechanism considerably.

PS. Magnetic Braking?
 
Looks like what is really important in this problem is the shape of the slot and the shape of the end of the pin. You do not want cam action to develop a forces that tends to unlock the shaft allowing it to rotate. This means that the side of the shaft slot that bears against the locking pin must push across the pin, with no axial component along the pin. Will it work? Sure, it will work provided the shapes are carefully determined, the geometry is carefully maintained by adequate supports and guides, and the materials do not fail.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K