Logarithmic decrement of a lightly damped oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The logarithmic decrement (δ) of a lightly damped oscillator is defined as δ = ln(An/An+1), where An represents the maximum displacement of the n-th cycle. The relationship between δ and the quality factor (Q) is established through the equations β = b/(2m) and Q = ωo/(2β). For a damped oscillator with a mass of 4.0 kg, a frequency of oscillation of 0.9 Hz, and a logarithmic decrement of 0.029, the spring constant (k) and damping constant (b) can be derived using these relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of damped harmonic motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of logarithmic decrement and quality factor (Q)
  • Knowledge of differential equations related to oscillatory systems
  • Basic physics principles regarding mass, spring constant, and damping
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the spring constant (k) using the formula k = m(2πf)^2
  • Determine the damping constant (b) using the relationship b = 2mβ
  • Explore the derivation of the relationship between logarithmic decrement (δ) and quality factor (Q)
  • Study the behavior of lightly damped oscillators in different physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mechanical vibrations, physics educators, and engineers working with oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.

kraigandrews
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The logarithmic decrement δ of a lightly damped oscillator is defined to be the natural logarithm of the ratio of successive maximum displacements (in the same direction) of a free damped oscillator. That is, δ = ln(An/An+1) where An is the maximum displacement of the n-th cycle. Derive the simple relationship between δ and Q.
Find the spring constant k and damping constant b of a damped oscillator with mass m, frequency of oscillation f and logarithmic decrement δ.
[Data: m = 4.0 kg; f = 0.9 Hz; δ = 0.029.]
First, the spring constant k...

Also, the damping constant b...


Homework Equations



\beta=b/(2m)
Q=\omega<sub>o</sub>/(2\beta)<br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> <br /> Given the diff eq:<br /> <br /> d<sup>2</sup>x/dt<sup>2</sup>+2\beta(dx/dt)+\omega<sub>o</sub><sup>2</sup>x=0<br /> <br /> I can solve this to find x(t), however I feel this is irrelevant because no initial condition or boundary conditions are given, so I am kinda lost here as to where go or to start at for that matter. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated, Thanks<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial conditions don't matter. Can you write the exponential term of the equation of motion in terms of Q? This term controls the amplitude of the oscillator, so the ratio between successive amplitudes is just the ratio between successive exponential terms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K