Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
Can it get any worse?
London Tower Block Fire: Latest News Updates
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
67 replies · 9K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Mentor
- 23,902
- 11,357
They must have gone to the Flint School of Public Health.jim hardy said:Looks like there's at least a half dozen entities playing the game of "Blame those guys instead" .
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 35,014
- 21,725
OK, so it's more than a month and we still don't know who, if anyone, violated which regulation.
This is a problem with regulation-based safety. The regulations can swell to the point where it takes an army of lawyers to find out who has to do what, and safety paperwork becomes the focus, not actual safety.
This is a problem with regulation-based safety. The regulations can swell to the point where it takes an army of lawyers to find out who has to do what, and safety paperwork becomes the focus, not actual safety.
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Dearly Missed
- 9,864
- 4,896
Vanadium 50 said:and safety paperwork becomes the focus, not actual safety.
That's the head of the nail right there.
That buildings can't read is anathema to paper shufflers.
Korean engineers I met at their KORI nuke plant have a saying -
"Give your process a soul. "
In other words - don't just squeak by the regulations , do the right thing.
Isn't that what wrecked San Onofre , short-cutting the design review process for steam generators?
old jim
Mikezilla
Pray tell what the hell is going on over there?
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news...cladding-from-towers-could-increase-fire-risk
Read the whole article. As a contractor, I'm dumbfounded.
Landlord jumped the gun on cladding. But to leave the insulation exposed like that for weeks is either incompetence, bureaucracy or both. Somebody's got to mind the store, or there won't be enough lawyers.
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news...cladding-from-towers-could-increase-fire-risk
The government has warned landlords that stripping suspect cladding from buildings in the wake of the Grenfell Tower blaze could increase the risk of fire, as it emerged combustible insulation has been left exposed for weeks on blocks in Salford that are home to more than 1,000 people.
Dozens of councils nationwide have been removing polyethylene-filled aluminium panels like those used on Grenfell, but now the department of communities and local government has warned building owners “not to create conditions which may worsen the integrity of the cladding system … [including] leaving material exposed which could reduce fire performance”.
The warning to landlords came as the Guardian established that insulation which is more combustible than that used across Grenfell Tower has been left exposed for up to three weeks on at least six blocks on the Pendleton estate in Salford, including at least one 22 storey tower.
...“People in this block and the other blocks want the insulation taken out,” said Jon Smith, a resident for the last 20 years of the 22 storey Thorne House on the Pendleton estate. “It is more dangerous in our opinion than the cladding that covers it because it is combustible. Now it is exposed, you only need some idiot after a night on the drink deciding to conduct their own fire test and the whole block goes up.”
Dozens of councils nationwide have been removing polyethylene-filled aluminium panels like those used on Grenfell, but now the department of communities and local government has warned building owners “not to create conditions which may worsen the integrity of the cladding system … [including] leaving material exposed which could reduce fire performance”.
The warning to landlords came as the Guardian established that insulation which is more combustible than that used across Grenfell Tower has been left exposed for up to three weeks on at least six blocks on the Pendleton estate in Salford, including at least one 22 storey tower.
...“People in this block and the other blocks want the insulation taken out,” said Jon Smith, a resident for the last 20 years of the 22 storey Thorne House on the Pendleton estate. “It is more dangerous in our opinion than the cladding that covers it because it is combustible. Now it is exposed, you only need some idiot after a night on the drink deciding to conduct their own fire test and the whole block goes up.”
Read the whole article. As a contractor, I'm dumbfounded.
Landlord jumped the gun on cladding. But to leave the insulation exposed like that for weeks is either incompetence, bureaucracy or both. Somebody's got to mind the store, or there won't be enough lawyers.
Mikezilla
If you're looking for lawsuits, Arconic has a shareholder going after them.
Everybody involved with this is going to get served: Celotex, Rydon, Harley Facades, RBKC. Perhaps architects depending on Inquiry. UK put faith in companies to operate safely, they didn't, so that's who they'll fine. The cynic in me says jail time for Harley since they're smallest of bunch.
In any case, main focus should be on getting other buildings up to code. If authorities can't enforce regulations, at least let tenants know.
Everybody involved with this is going to get served: Celotex, Rydon, Harley Facades, RBKC. Perhaps architects depending on Inquiry. UK put faith in companies to operate safely, they didn't, so that's who they'll fine. The cynic in me says jail time for Harley since they're smallest of bunch.
In any case, main focus should be on getting other buildings up to code. If authorities can't enforce regulations, at least let tenants know.
Mikezilla
Apparently the ACM and insulation don't even meet EU standards either...
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40645205
According to data released by French authorities, and seen by the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme, the cladding would have released 43.2 MJ/kg of heat.
The European A2 standard for "limited combustibility" is 3 MJ/kg.
The foam insulation underneath the cladding was, separately, thought to emit around 26 MJ/kg of heat.
...An estimated 18 tonnes of insulation foam and eight tonnes of cladding panels were attached to the tower, analysis of planning documents by the University of Leeds suggests.
The energy released when all these combustible materials burned would have been equivalent to around 51 tonnes of pinewood wrapped around the building in two thin 12mm sheets, separated by a 50mm gap with holes cut out for windows, it says.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40645205
According to data released by French authorities, and seen by the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme, the cladding would have released 43.2 MJ/kg of heat.
The European A2 standard for "limited combustibility" is 3 MJ/kg.
The foam insulation underneath the cladding was, separately, thought to emit around 26 MJ/kg of heat.
...An estimated 18 tonnes of insulation foam and eight tonnes of cladding panels were attached to the tower, analysis of planning documents by the University of Leeds suggests.
The energy released when all these combustible materials burned would have been equivalent to around 51 tonnes of pinewood wrapped around the building in two thin 12mm sheets, separated by a 50mm gap with holes cut out for windows, it says.