MHB Longitudinal excitation of a sine wave

Nino1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!
This is a problem regarding a quarter car model driving over a sinusoidal road excitation.

A sinusoidal excitation can be written on the form ze^(jωt), z being vertical. I would like to write the longitudinal excitation of a sine wave on the same form?

Any hints and tips are much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nino said:
Hi!
This is a problem regarding a quarter car model driving over a sinusoidal road excitation.

A sinusoidal excitation can be written on the form ze^(jωt), z being vertical. I would like to write the longitudinal excitation of a sine wave on the same form?

Any hints and tips are much appreciated.

Welcome to MHB, Nino! :)

Looks like your z-coordinate is of the form $$z=A_z e^{j\omega_z t}$$, where $A_z$ is an amplitude and $\omega_z$ is the angular frequency for the excitation in the z direction.

If that was your intention, you can use a similar formula for your x coordinate.
Assuming your car model drives in the x direction with some average speed $v_x$, a possible formula for the x coordinate is:
$$x = v_x + A_x e^{\displaystyle j\omega_x t}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top