Longitudinal Wave Equation from Transverse One

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the longitudinal wave equation from the transverse wave equation in the context of fluid mechanics. The participant utilizes the conservation of volume principle, leading to the equation $$\Psi \approx - h\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial x}$$, where $$\Psi$$ represents the longitudinal displacement and $$\eta$$ denotes the transverse displacement. The participant expresses uncertainty regarding the validity of their assumptions, particularly the approximation of $$\eta$$ when $$h >> \psi$$. The consensus suggests maintaining the use of $$\delta \eta$$ for longitudinal changes while using $$\psi(x)$$ for transverse changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations in fluid mechanics
  • Familiarity with conservation of volume principles
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Basic concepts of longitudinal and transverse waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave equations in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the implications of small perturbations in wave mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between longitudinal and transverse waves in different media
  • Investigate the application of partial differential equations in wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, fluid dynamics, and applied mathematics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of wave behavior in various contexts.

bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Please see attached.
Part ii)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So I try to conserve volume as it suggests in the hint. I take the initial volume of the region to be given by:
$$ h \times \delta x \times l = (\delta x + \eta) (h+\Psi) l $$
Where l is just some fixed, constant length which can immediately be canceled. Expanding:
$$ \Psi \delta x = - \eta (\psi + h) $$
But ## h>> \psi \implies (\psi+h) \approx h ##
$$ \Psi \delta x = - \eta h $$
For small values of ## \eta ## (which is implied by the fact that ## \psi ## is small? ) we can make the statement:
$$ \eta \approx \frac{\partial \eta}{ \partial x} \delta x $$
So that:
$$ \Psi \approx - h\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial x} $$

Well, I got to the result, but I'm just not sure that this approach is correct - for instance should I not put ## \delta \Psi## instead of ## \Psi## - but then I have second differentials and I get the wrong answer... - also not entirely sure how to justify the assumption that if ## h >> \psi ## then ## \eta ## must be small... or is that okay because we are just approximating?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-04-26 at 16.24.01.png
    Screen Shot 2015-04-26 at 16.24.01.png
    20.5 KB · Views: 753
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you shouldn't use ##\delta \psi## cause the change in the transverse direction of the volume is simply ##\psi(x)## however you should use ##\delta \eta## cause the change in the longitudinal direction of the volume is ##\eta(x+\delta x)-\eta(x)=\delta \eta##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K