High School How Has the Calculation of Solar System Body SGPs Evolved Over Time?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of standard gravity parameters (SGPs) for solar system bodies has evolved significantly since the early observations of celestial mechanics. Initial estimates of Jupiter's SGP were likely derived from the motion of its moons, following the establishment of Newtonian theory. The Schiehallion experiment of 1774 marked a pivotal moment in determining the gravitational constant, leading to more accurate calculations of planetary masses. George Biddell Airy's 1833 article highlighted the discrepancies in earlier measurements of Jupiter's mass, emphasizing the importance of the product of gravitational constant (G) and mass (M) for predicting orbital motions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian gravity and its implications for celestial mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of gravitational constant (G) and its measurement challenges
  • Knowledge of orbital mechanics and how they relate to mass calculations
  • Awareness of historical experiments like the Schiehallion experiment and their significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context and significance of the Schiehallion experiment in gravitational studies
  • Explore George Biddell Airy's contributions to astronomy and his methods for calculating planetary masses
  • Learn about the current techniques for measuring gravitational constant (G) with high precision
  • Investigate the relationship between orbital mechanics and the determination of standard gravity parameters (SGPs)
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of celestial mechanics who are interested in the historical evolution of gravitational calculations and their implications for understanding solar system dynamics.

GregM
Messages
18
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
history of standard gravity parameter measurements
does anyone have a good reference on the history of calculating the standard gravity parameters of solar system bodies? My guess is a rough estimate of Jupiter's SGP can be gained from observing the motion of its moons, in which case the first estimates could have been made soon after Newtonian theory had made SGPs pertinent to astronomy. Or maybe the estimates were already there in an rearrangement in the numbers gained from Galilean observations around 1610.

R.jpg
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's likely that scientists first determined the gravitational constant and then used that to determine the mass of the Sun, Moon, and planets. From those two values you can get the SGP by multiplying them together. As far as I am aware, the first semi-accurate measurement to determine the gravitational constant (actually the density of the Earth, from which you can get the constant) was the Schiehallion experiment of 1774. This found the density of the Earth to be about 4500 kg/m3, about 20% off from the modern value of 5515 kg/m3.

Jupiter's mass was calculated at various times afterward. Here is George Biddell Airy's article from 1833 in the Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 6, p.83 in which he determines the mass of Jupiter by observing the orbit of its 4th satellite. He seems somewhat aghast that various measurements had differed widely up to that point and that no one had lately tried to reconcile them properly. I'm not actually certain what value he obtained, as he states it in a way I've never seen before. Something about a logarithm of the mass.
 
GM is known far better for the planets than G or M. (Indeed, M is essentially unknown directly - it's actually (GM)/G )
 
Vanadium 50 said:
GM is known far better for the planets than G or M. (Indeed, M is essentially unknown directly - it's actually (GM)/G )
Ah I wasn't aware of this. A little more reading of the wiki article gives me this:
Thus only the product of G and M is needed to predict the motion of the smaller body. Conversely, measurements of the smaller body's orbit only provide information on the product, μ, not G and M separately. The gravitational constant, G, is difficult to measure with high accuracy,[12] while orbits, at least in the solar system, can be measured with great precision and used to determine μ with similar precision.

Very interesting.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
15K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K