Looking for an idea for proving inequality, probably using binomial theorem.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 6K views
Polychoron
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Guess what? I just got my new calculus book last week! ^^

The book opens with the definition of the real numbers by Dedekind and goes to prove properties of this numbering system such as The supremum axiom and others.
At the end of the chapter are about 30 exercises without their solutions; some practice of the chapter and some algebraic preparation for the next chapter deals with limits (mainly inequalities).

I want to consult with you about one inequality:
Prove that if x>y>0 and n>1 natural number than
n(x-y)yn-1< xn - yn < n(x-y)xn-1

I managed to elegantly prove the left part and it goes like that:
[tex]x^{n}=[y+(x-y)]^{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}y^{k}(x-y)^{n-k}=y^{n}+\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\binom{n}{k}y^{k}(x-y)^{n-k}[/tex]
from here:
[tex]x^{n}-y^{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\binom{n}{k}y^{k}(x-y)^{n-k}=(x-y)[\sum_{k=0}^{n-2}\binom{n}{k}y^{k}(x-y)^{n-k-1}+\binom{n}{n-1}y^{n-1}]>(x-y)ny^{n-1}[/tex]
As we were asked to show.

About the right inequality, well, it's not working so nicely...
When I try the same concept but slightly different, I have a hard time showing the last transition (where the "<" sine comes to play)

I got:
[tex]x^{n}-y^{n}=(x-y)[\sum_{k=0}^{n-2}\binom{n}{k}x^{k}(y-x)^{n-k-1}+\binom{n}{n-1}x^{n-1}][/tex]

Ans it stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice.

I agree that if the identity is right then the inequalities immediately derive from it. But can you prove it?
Of course I can see it by open the parenthesis, I simply don't fan of identities that came out of nowhere...
 
Last edited:
Ya,
Polychoron said:
Of course I can see it by open the parenthesis, I simply don't fan of identities that came out of nowhere...
I thought maybe there is a way to derived it directly from xn-yn...
 
I guess if you wanted to prove what mathman used you could use the polynomial reminder theorem, but it's fairly obvious and I think common knowledge. Perhaps induction would be easier, either way, it's straight forward enough, if you desire to do so.
 
Polychoron said:
Nice.

I agree that if the identity is right then the inequalities immediately derive from it. But can you prove it?
Of course I can see it by open the parenthesis, I simply don't fan of identities that came out of nowhere...

Use the geometric series summation formula with a = xn-1 and r = y/x