Using binomial theorem in exponential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the binomial theorem in deriving expressions related to Bessel functions, specifically in the context of the integral I_{k,n} = (1/2π)∫_{-π}^{π}(e^{jθ}-e^{-jθ})^{n+2k}e^{-jnθ}dθ. Participants confirm that only terms with e^{jnθ} survive integration over the interval [-π, π], as all other exponential terms result in zero. The conversation highlights the challenges in finding comprehensive resources on Bessel functions, with users sharing insights on the derivation process and the importance of understanding the underlying mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the binomial theorem
  • Familiarity with complex exponentials and Euler's formula
  • Knowledge of Bessel functions and their properties
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Bessel functions in detail
  • Explore advanced integration techniques for complex functions
  • Review literature on the applications of the binomial theorem in mathematical physics
  • Investigate resources that provide step-by-step explanations of Bessel function derivations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or mathematical physics, particularly those interested in Bessel functions and their applications in various fields.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
In page 11 of http://math.arizona.edu/~zakharov/BesselFunctions.pdf, I am trying to follow the derivation using binomial theorem to get this step:

(e^{j\theta}-e^{-j\theta})^{n+2k}≈\frac{(n+2K)!}{k!(n+k)!}(e^{j\theta})^{n+k}(-e^{-j\theta})^kIf you read the paragraph right above this equation, it said only the terms that has the ##e^{jn\theta}## alone will not be integrated to zero. So the equation becomes:(e^{j\theta}-e^{-j\theta})^{n+2k}≈\frac{(n+2K)!}{k!(n+k)!}(e^{j\theta})^{n+k}(-e^{-j\theta})^k
As it's the ##(k+1)^{th}## term.

Is it because when substitute into (53)
I_{k,n}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}(e^{j\theta}-e^{-j\theta})^{n+2k}e^{-jn\theta}d\theta
Only the term that has ##e^{jn\theta}## alone can cancel out the ##e^{-jn\theta}## term in (53). Any ##e^{jn\theta}## type exponential term will result in zero after integrate from ##-\pi## to ##\pi##. Am I correct.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are correct. The only way \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{jb\theta} d\theta can be non-zero is if b=0 (and the integrand is constant).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
HS-Scientist said:
Yes, you are correct. The only way \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{jb\theta} d\theta can be non-zero is if b=0 (and the integrand is constant).

Thanks, you are of big help. I just cannot find any good books that explain Bessel Functions, all the ones I read seemed to assume you know a lot of the derivation and just gave the final equation without a good explanation. The three article including the one you gave are as good as any book in this subject. But the problem is I found inconsistency in their formulas that call into question( most likely are typos). This really hold up my study as I have to stop and really go through it again and again. I have to even post again in another thread just on the very page of this article later.

Thanks for all the detail help. The one you took the time to type for the ##\cos(x\sin\theta)## is the utmost helpful. I went through step by step and really learn a lot.

Thanks
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K