Looking for an Introduction to American Politics?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter QueenFisher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for introductory books on American politics, including the election system, Congress, and the Senate. Participants explore various foundational texts and their relevance to understanding contemporary political dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest foundational texts such as "Democracy in America" by Alexis de Tocqueville, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as starting points for understanding American politics.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of reading the founding documents to grasp the intended workings of the American system, while also indicating a willingness to discuss the current state of the system afterward.
  • Another participant argues that the founding documents reflect the perspectives of white men and do not adequately address the experiences of women, slaves, and Native Americans, questioning their relevance to modern political understanding.
  • There is a suggestion that the founding documents are idealistic and do not account for historical developments such as the Civil War and Women's Liberation, which complicate their applicability to contemporary politics.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the notion that reading the founding documents will provide a comprehensive understanding of today's political landscape, viewing it as overly simplistic or idealistic.
  • One participant notes that while the founding documents are foundational to American history, they also contain problematic elements, such as the 3/5 compromise regarding slavery.
  • Another participant highlights the flexibility and ambiguity of the founding documents, suggesting that they were designed to adapt to future changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relevance and interpretation of foundational texts in understanding American politics. There is no consensus on the value of these documents, with some advocating for their importance and others challenging their applicability to modern issues.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the historical context of the founding documents and their limitations in addressing the complexities of contemporary society. There are unresolved discussions regarding the implications of these texts for civil liberties and minority rights.

QueenFisher
i read a book recently that was based on politics in america (a fiction book), and i wondered if anyone knows of any good sort of general introductory books an american politics? like, the election system, congress, the senate, that kind of thing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexis de Toqueville's Democracy in America
 
After you read the founding papers and how the American system is supposed to work, I'll be glad to refer you to reading on how the system really is now.
 
SOS2008 said:
After you read the founding papers and how the American system is supposed to work, I'll be glad to refer you to reading on how the system really is now.
You got to start out with the fairy-tale version of America, otherwise, how are you supposed to understand what everyone's supposedly striving for?

Though, of course, the current U.S. government and population has different ideals than did those who set it up in the late 1700's. But then, even George Washington's administration was accused of violating the Constitution and abandoning American ideals.

One of the main things about our founding documents, however, is that they're made to be flexible, and made to be ambiguous. Our Founders knew there'd be lots of changes in the future, and set up the U.S.A. so that it would be flexible and able to grow into whatever it needed to be.

But besides all that ideological crap, there's also plain illegal and immoral stuff going on, just as there is in any government.
 
Well, the founding documents were all by, and about, white men. Nothing about their wives, slaves, the native americans who were in their expansionist way, etc.

We've had a Civil War, Women's Lib, and are currently in a scandal involving a lobbyist for some of the tribes. None of this could be deduced from the founding documents, and the idea that reading them will greatly inform anyone about how politics works today is just silly, or idealistic. And the idea that we SHOULD behave the way Madison dreamed we might (absent all those ignored people) in the agrarian pre-industrial world he lived in is even worse!
 
I'd rather live according to Madison than Madison Avenue.
 
selfAdjoint said:
Well, the founding documents were all by, and about, white men. Nothing about their wives, slaves, the native americans who were in their expansionist way, etc.

We've had a Civil War, Women's Lib, and are currently in a scandal involving a lobbyist for some of the tribes. None of this could be deduced from the founding documents, and the idea that reading them will greatly inform anyone about how politics works today is just silly, or idealistic. And the idea that we SHOULD behave the way Madison dreamed we might (absent all those ignored people) in the agrarian pre-industrial world he lived in is even worse!
True. At the current time I am most concerned about checks and balances as it applies to protection of civil liberties and minority rights:

Constitutionalism is the idea, often associated with the political theories of John Locke and the "founders" of the American republic, and equated with the concept of the "Rule of Law", that government can and should be legally limited in its powers, and that its authority depends on enforcing these limitations.
http://www.constitution.org/constitutionalism.htm
 
  • #10
WarrenPlatts said:
Alexis de Toqueville's Democracy in America
Ditto on Toqueville. But don't expect an objective description though, it presents a specific viewpoint, that of a 'progressive aristocrat' from the age of emerging (classical) liberalism. This is valuable though because he really raises a lot of questions and thoughts on the US political system and culture.

Tocqueville was one of the first European Academics to take the US seriously. He had some great insights.
 
  • #11
QueenFisher said:
i read a book recently that was based on politics in america (a fiction book), and i wondered if anyone knows of any good sort of general introductory books an american politics? like, the election system, congress, the senate, that kind of thing.

You might try Wikipedia.
 
  • #12
selfAdjoint said:
Well, the founding documents were all by, and about, white men. Nothing about their wives, slaves, the native americans who were in their expansionist way, etc.

We've had a Civil War, Women's Lib, and are currently in a scandal involving a lobbyist for some of the tribes. None of this could be deduced from the founding documents, and the idea that reading them will greatly inform anyone about how politics works today is just silly, or idealistic. And the idea that we SHOULD behave the way Madison dreamed we might (absent all those ignored people) in the agrarian pre-industrial world he lived in is even worse!
Well, there was something about slaves. 3/5 comprimise, and the thing about no new slaves being imported after 1810 or something.

And of course it's different today than it was then, but those are still the basis of American history, whether you like it or not, whether they were fair/good/proper/racist/evil, they are the basis of everything.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
10K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 129 ·
5
Replies
129
Views
21K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
9K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K