Looking for deltaK, change in total kinetic energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the change in total kinetic energy (ΔK) of a system involving two pucks on a frictionless air table, where one puck is initially at rest and the other is in motion before a collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for ΔK, with one noting an initial incorrect value and questioning the sign of the result. There are discussions about significant figures and potential rounding errors in the calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and emphasizing the importance of significant figures. There is no explicit consensus on the correct value of ΔK yet, as participants are still exploring the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for significant figures in their calculations and question whether the assignment has specific requirements regarding units and precision.

dukebdx12
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
On a frictionless horizontal air table, puck A (with mass 0.253 kg) is moving toward puck B (with mass 0.373 kg), which is initially at rest. After the collision, puck A has velocity 0.124 m/s to the left, and puck B has velocity 0.650 m/s to the right.

Calculate DeltaK, the change in the total kinetic energy of the system that occurs during the collision.

- I got ΔK = .007 but was not right
-puck A with speed 0.834 is 0.5*0.253*(0.834)2 . Total energy of the two pucks afterwards are 0.5*0.253*(0.124)2 +0.5*0.373*(0.650)2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you did should be right, but your change should be negative though.
 
yea...-0.007 was my first answer which was wrong also.

edit...i think it is wrong because it is supposed to be in J.
 
That is in joules. Is this a web assignment? Perhaps you don't have enough significant figures.
 
yea i realized it is in joules after looking again. At first I put in -.007 yesterday and now I put in -0.007 and it says:
"Not quite. Check through your calculations; you may have made a rounding error or used the wrong number of significant figures." which 4 sig figures is right. so I am not sure and usually if I am around the answer it will round it for me.
 
Yeah, you didn't use enough significant figures. Your answer has one sig-fig when your given values have three.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K