- 24,753
- 795
http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4105
Lorentz breaking Effective Field Theory and observational tests
Stefano Liberati
(Submitted on 19 Mar 2012)
Analogue models of gravity have provided an experimentally realizable test field for our ideas on quantum field theory in curved spacetimes but they have also inspired the investigation of possible departures from exact Lorentz invariance at microscopic scales. In this role they have joined, and sometime anticipated, several quantum gravity models characterized by Lorentz breaking phenomenology. A crucial difference between these speculations and other ones associated to quantum gravity scenarios, is the possibility to carry out observational and experimental tests which have nowadays led to a broad range of constraints on departures from Lorentz invariance. We shall review here the effective field theory approach to Lorentz breaking in the matter sector, present the constraints provided by the available observations and finally discuss the implications of the persisting uncertainty on the composition of the ultra high energy cosmic rays for the constraints on the higher order, analogue gravity inspired, Lorentz violations.
47 pages, 4 figures. Lecture Notes for the IX SIGRAV School on "Analogue Gravity", Como (Italy), May 2011
http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4207
The phase diagram of quantum gravity from diffeomorphism-invariant RG-flows
Ivan Donkin, Jan M. Pawlowski
(Submitted on 19 Mar 2012)
We evaluate the phase diagram of quantum gravity within a fully diffeomorphism-invariant renormalisation group approach. The construction is based on the geometrical or Vilkovisky-DeWitt effective action. We also resolve the difference between the fluctuation metric and the background metric. This allows for fully background-independent flows in gravity. The results provide further evidence for the ultraviolet fixed point scenario in quantum gravity with quantitative changes for the fixed point physics. We also find a stable infrared fixed point related to classical Einstein gravity. Implications and possible extensions are discussed.
23 pages, 13 figures
brief mention:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4197
Is the Cosmological Coincidence a Problem?
Navin Sivanandam
(Submitted on 19 Mar 2012)
The matching of our epoch of existence with the approximate equality of dark energy and dark matter energy densities is an apparent further fine-tuning, beyond the already troubling 120 orders of magnitude that separate dark energy from the Planck scale. In this paper I will argue that the coincidence is not a fine-tuning problem, but instead an artifact of anthropic selection. Rather than assuming measurements are equally likely in all epochs, one should insist that measurements of a quantity be typical amongst all such measurements. As a consequence, particular observations will reflect the epoch in which they are most easily made. In the specific case of cosmology, most measurements of dark energy and dark matter will done during an epoch when large numbers of linear modes are available to observers, so we should not be surprised at living at such a time. This is made precise in a particular model for the probability distribution for r=min(Ωm/ΩL, ΩL/Ωm), where it is shown that if p(r) ~ [N(r)]b (where N(r) is the number of linear modes, and b is some arbitrary positive power), the probability that r is greater than its observed value of 0.4, is close to 1. Thus the cosmological coincidence is no longer problematic.
10 pages, 5 figures
http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.3827
Where will Einstein fail? Lessons for gravity and cosmology
Niayesh Afshordi (U-Waterloo/Perimeter Institute)
(Submitted on 16 Mar 2012)
Einstein's theory of General Relativity is the benchmark example for empirical success and mathematical elegance in theoretical physics. However, in spite of being the most successfully tested theory in physics, there are strong theoretical and observational arguments for why General Relativity should fail. It is not a question of if, but rather a question of where and when! I start by recounting the tremendous success in observational cosmology over the past three decades, that has led to the era of precision cosmology. I will then summarize the pathologies in Einstein's theory of gravity, as the cornerstone of standard cosmological model. Attempts to address these pathologies are either inspired by mathematical elegance, or empirical falsifiability. Here, I provide different arguments for why a falsifiable solution should violate Lorentz symmetry, or revive "gravitational aether". Deviations from Einstein's gravity are then expected in: 1) cosmological matter-radiation transition, 2) neutron stars, 3) gravitomagnetic effect, 4) astrophysical black holes, and their potential connection to dark energy, and 5) early Universe, where the predictions are ranked by their degree of robustness and falsifiability.
20 pages, 3 figures, Based on the Professor M.K. Vainu Bappu gold medal award (2008) lecture given at IUCAA, Pune on 2011 October 15, To appear in the 2012 March issue of the Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India
Last edited: