Loop-the-loop with potentional and kinetic energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum height from which a mass of 77 kg must be released to successfully navigate a loop-the-loop with a radius of 15.1 m. The key equations utilized include potential energy (PE = mgh) and kinetic energy (KE = mv²/2), along with the condition that centripetal acceleration (a_c = v²/r) must exceed gravitational acceleration for the mass to maintain its path. The correct height for release is determined to be 22.65 m, factoring in the need for sufficient kinetic energy at the top of the loop to prevent the mass from falling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of centripetal acceleration and its relationship to gravitational acceleration
  • Familiarity with conservation of energy principles
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between centripetal force and gravitational force in circular motion
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore the dynamics of frictionless motion on curved tracks
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass and radius on loop-the-loop dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy conservation and motion dynamics in circular paths.

Yae Miteo
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass m = 77 kg slides on a frictionless track that has a drop, followed by a loop-the-loop with radius R = 15.1 m and finally a flat straight section at the same height as the center of the loop (15.1 m off the ground). Since the mass would not make it around the loop if released from the height of the top of the loop (do you know why?) it must be released above the top of the loop-the-loop height. (Assume the mass never leaves the smooth track at any point on its path.)

part 2) What height above the ground must the mass begin to make it around the loop-the-loop?

Homework Equations



PE=mgh
KE = \frac {mv^2}{2}

and perhaps
a_c = \frac {v^2} {r}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I began by setting KE = PE
KE = PE
mgh = \frac {mv^2}{2}

cancel out
\frac {v^2}{r} = gh

solve for h
h = \frac{v^2}{2g}

plug in and find h
h=7.54999

add to radius of loop, and answer is
22.65

However, this is not the correct answer. I feel that I am close, but I am not sure what I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yae Miteo said:
I began by setting KE = PE

Kinetic energy where and potential energy where?

Note that (as stated in the problem) the mass will not make it through the loop if it has zero velocity at the top of the loop. Can you find a condition that must be fulfilled for the mass to make it around?
 
It needs enough kinetic energy to reach the top, which gets turned into potential energy right when it gets there. That way, it will make it around the loop.
 
Yae Miteo said:
It needs enough kinetic energy to reach the top, which gets turned into potential energy right when it gets there. That way, it will make it around the loop.

This is exactly what the problem statement told you will not happen. If it, by some magical means, reached the top with zero velocity, what would happen to it right after it made it to the top?
 
Hmm... if it had zero velocity at the top, it would stop and fall straight down. I need to develop a different approach.
Perhaps at the top
 
KE \gt PE
 
Can you perhaps think of a condition on the velocity that must be fulfilled for the mass not to fall down faster than the track is bending?
 
Centripetal acceleration must be greater than gravitational acceleration.
 
Exactly, so this is what gives you the relation between gravitational and centripetal acceleration in the limiting case.

Looking at your OP again, it seems to me that you have a velocity already since you say you plug it in. It also seems part 1 of the problem is missing and that makes me suspect that finding this velocity was part 1. This is important information that should be included. Is this the case? If so, you did have the correct equations, although the argumentation was not clear - which is why I asked for where the potential should be equal to a kinetic energy which was measured where. Total energy is conserved and the kinetic energy at release is zero. If kinetic energy equals potential energy at that point, they will not at a later. The argument you are looking for is that the gain in kinetic energy is equal to the loss of potential energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K