Loop-the-Loop and velocity problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter GiantSheeps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bead sliding without friction around a loop-the-loop, released from a height of 10.1 m. The goal is to determine the speed of the bead at the top of the loop, which has a radius of 3 m, while considering gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss energy conservation principles, comparing potential and kinetic energy at different points. Questions arise regarding the validity of dividing the speed by two and the significance of height in energy calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on focusing on energy comparisons between the starting point and the top of the loop. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made in the original poster's calculations, particularly regarding the treatment of energy and speed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of maintaining units in calculations and question the reasoning behind certain steps taken in the original attempt. There is a mention of forum rules against providing full solutions, emphasizing the collaborative nature of the discussion.

GiantSheeps
Messages
83
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A bead slides without friction around a loop-the-loop. The bead is released from a height of 10.1 m from the bottom of the loop-the-loop which has a radius 3 m. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2 .

What is its speed at the top of the loop? Answer in units of m/s.

Homework Equations


w=Fd
PE=mgh
KE=1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution


My first thought was to find the PE of the ball at the top, since the KE and the PE are always going to add up to that number, no matter where the ball is on the track. I did mgh = 1/2mv^2 = m(9.8)(10.1) = 98.98m

So the PE = mass times 98.98

then i did 98.98m=1/2mv^2 to get v=14.06982587, then i divided that by two since the ball is at the top of the loop, it's halfway through it i thought to get 7.034912935, which was wrong...

So what am I doing wrong? Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand why you divided the speed by 2. How does it matter which fraction of the loop the bead made so far? Do you expect it to magically stop at the end, for example?
Your general approach allows to calculate the speed for every height, if you adjust the height difference accordingly.

Please do not drop units in the calculations, they are important tools to check what you are doing and leaving them out is simply wrong.
 
GiantSheeps said:
then i divided that by two since the ball is at the top of the loop, it's halfway through it i thought
There's no basis for that step.
Forget about the bottom of the loop. Just compare energies at start with energies at top of loop.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GiantSheeps
haruspex said:
Just compare energies at start with energies at top of loop.
Ah thank you haruspex i appreciate your help, i got the answer. Thank you for not being sarcastic and rude
 
GiantSheeps said:
Thank you for not being sarcastic and rude
Oh well, there's always next time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GiantSheeps
haruspex said:
There's no basis for that step.
Forget about the bottom of the loop. Just compare energies at start with energies at top of loop.

What do you mean by comparing the two energies?
 
Something went wrong with the sign of the gR term. A larger radius will lead to a smaller velocity.

Giving full solutions is against the forum rules, but this thread is two years old - just let it rest.

Edit: Merged some posts.
 
Last edited:
sorry

for the mistake in sign
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Archy1111111 said:
What do you mean by comparing the two energies?
PE+KE at release point versus PE+KE at top of loop.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K