Lorentz attractors and fractals

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractals Lorentz
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the self-similarity and scale invariance of Lorenz attractors, as defined in Viswanath's 2004 paper. Participants explore the concept that zooming into specific points on the attractor reveals increasingly complex orbits, which may not visually resemble the overall structure. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of perceiving the fractal nature of Lorenz attractors due to the vast difference in scale between the overall orbit and its intricate details.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fractals and their properties, particularly self-similarity
  • Familiarity with Lorenz attractors and chaotic systems
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical visualization techniques
  • Ability to interpret scientific papers, specifically in mathematics and physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of self-similarity in fractals through resources like "Fractals: A Very Short Introduction"
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of chaotic systems, focusing on the Lorenz system
  • Learn about visualization techniques for complex systems using software like MATLAB or Python's Matplotlib
  • Read Viswanath's 2004 paper on the fractal property of the Lorenz attractor for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students interested in chaos theory, fractals, and the visual representation of complex dynamical systems.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
as far as I know a "fractal", by definition should manifest self-similarity or at least statistical self-similarity. This usually takes the form of scale invariance.
Can anyone point out where is the self-similarity in the plots of Lorentz attractors?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Viswanath, D. (2004) The fractal property of the Lorenz attractor. Physica D, 190: 115–128.

http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~divakar/papers/Viswanath2004.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
...I still have troubles understanding where is the self-similarity, especially the scale-invariance.
I understand that "zooming" into one point will reveal more and more orbits (infinitely many). Still I don´t see how that is similar to the whole.

Referring to the article you mentioned: where is the resemblance of the plots in figure 2 (a part) with the plot in figure 1 (the whole) ?

Any hint?
 
Last edited:
mnb96 said:
...I still have troubles understanding where is the self-similarity, especially the scale-invariance.
I understand that "zooming" into one point will reveal more and more orbits (infinitely many). Still I don´t see how that is similar to the whole.

Referring to the article you mentioned: where is the resemblance of the plots in figure 2 (a part) with the plot in figure 1 (the whole) ?

Any hint?

You zoom in, you see a pile of sticks. But if you zoom in on each of those piles of sticks, they're piles of sticks... but each of those piles of sticks are piles of sticks.

You can't see the whole orbit at once because the semimajor axis (approximating it as an oval) is huge compared to the thickness of the "sticks", so we're forced to look at little sections of the orbits, that cuts off at each end, making it look like... well, a pile of sticks.
 
Thanks.
Now it is clear.
 
I meant that you zoom in on a stick and it's really a bunch of sticks, them you zoom in one of those sticks and it's really a bunch, etc. But hopefully you saw past my redundancy.
 
Yes. don´t worry. It was pretty clear to me that you meant to zoom in on one "stick". The explanation was clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
698
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K