Lorentz gamma factor in a decay of arbitrary leptons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Lorentz gamma factor for the decay process K^+ → l^+ ν_l, where ν represents either an electron or muon neutrino. The gamma factor is established as γ = (m_K^2 + m_l^2) / (2m_K m_l). The proof involves equating the rest energy of the kaon to the energies of the decay products and manipulating the equations to isolate the momentum of the lepton. The final expression for the gamma factor is confirmed through algebraic simplification of the velocity equation derived from Griffiths' work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle decay processes, specifically kaon decay.
  • Familiarity with relativistic energy-momentum relations.
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations and gamma factors.
  • Basic proficiency in algebraic manipulation of physical equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz factor in different decay scenarios.
  • Explore the implications of energy-momentum conservation in particle physics.
  • Learn about the role of neutrinos in particle decay processes.
  • Investigate advanced topics in relativistic kinematics and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying particle physics, as well as educators and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of particle decay processes.

Ai52487963
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the Lorentz gamma factor in the decay

K^+ \rightarrow l^+ \nu_l

can be written as

\gamma = \frac{m_K^2 + m_l^2}{2m_K m_l}

where nu is either e or mu.


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm stuck on a part of the proof. I think I understand most of it, except for one crucial part:

So I'm starting with the invariant and listing out the energies of the particles involved:

E^2 - \textbf{p}^2c^2 = m^2c^4

Energy of the Kaon (at rest initially)
E_k = m_K c^2

Energy of subsequent decay particles, ignoring the leftover mass that is the UC(bar). I don't really know why, but it seems like its pertinent to ignore that for now. So for the arbitrary lepton:
E_l = c (m_l^2 c^2 + \textbf{p}_l^2)^{1/2}

and the arbitrary associated nutrino we have:
E_{\nu} = |\textbf{p}_{\nu}|c = |\textbf{p}_l|c

Now we know that the rest energy of the Kaon is going to be equal to the energies of the lepton plus neutrino (easy stuff)

m_K c^2 = c (m_l^2 c^2 + \textbf{p}_l^2)^{1/2} + |\textbf{p}_l|c

Now subtracting the momentum term to the other side, dividing by c and squaring:

(m_K c - |\textbf{p}_l|)^2= m_l^2 c^2 + \textbf{p}_l^2

and solving for the momentum gives:

|\textbf{p}_l| = \frac{m_K^2 - m_l^2}{2 m_K}c

Here's where I get into trouble. I know from a problem in Griffiths that for this kind of decay, velocity of the lepton is given by:

\frac{v}{c} = \frac{m_K^2 - m_l^2}{m_K^2 + m_l^2}

and that the lorentz factor:

\gamma = \frac{1}{(1- \left( \frac{v}{c} \right )^2)^{1/2}}

when you slap in that v, becomes:

\gamma = \frac{m_K^2 + m_l^2}{\left( (m_K^2 +m_l^2)^2 - (m_K^2 - m_l^2)^2 \right)^{1/2}}

which reduces to:

\gamma = \frac{m_K^2 + m_l^2}{2m_K m_l}

which is what I set out to prove.

I don't get this step:

|\textbf{p}_K| = \frac{m_K^2 - m_l^2}{2m_K} c \rightarrow \frac{m_K^2 - m_l^2}{m_k^2 + m_l^2}c

Doing that seems like an easy way to solve the problem, but ignores the fact that the kaon mass is NOT half of the kaon squared plus the lepton squared (or is it?). Plus there's the issue of the units.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not really sure why you are mixing results from two different problems. If you solve the problem correctly then you should get the final velocity directly; you don't need to find it out from somewhere else. Now, in this case it seems unnecessary. The total energy of the lepton is E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4 = \gamma^2 m^2 c^4, so once you have correctly obtained the momentum it should be fairly straightforward to determine the Lorentz factor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K