Leptonic-Hadronic Tensor Multiplication Proof with Rest and Final Target Momenta

  • Thread starter Muh. Fauzi M.
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Exercise
In summary, the proof of the leptonic-hadronic tensor multiplication shows that with rest target and final target momentum, and incoming and outgoing electron momenta, the contraction of the hadronic tensor and leptonic tensor is equal to 8 times the expression 2(k·p)(k'·p) + q^2/2M^2. The contraction also confirms the relativistic limit.
  • #1
Muh. Fauzi M.
17
1

Homework Statement


Proof the leptonic-hadronic tensor multiplication, with ##p^\mu=(M,\textbf{0})## and ##p'^\mu=(E',\textbf{p}')## is rest target and final target momentum respectively, and ##k^\mu=(\omega,\textbf{k})##, ##k'\mu=(\omega'
,\textbf{k}')## is momenta of incoming and outgoing electron, hence we get

$$L_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu}=8\Big(2(k\cdot p)(k'\cdot p)+\frac{q^2}{2M^2}\Big)$$

Homework Equations



The hadronic tensor,
$$T^{\mu\nu}=(p+p')^\mu(p+p')^\nu$$

The leptonic tensor,
$$L_{\mu\nu}=2\Big(k'_\mu k\nu+k'_\nu k_\mu + \frac{1}{2}q^2g_{\mu\nu}\Big)$$.

The Attempt at a Solution



I try something like this

$$ L_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} = 2\Big(k'_\mu k_\nu+k'_\nu k_\mu + \frac{1}{2}q^2g_{\mu\nu}\Big) (p+p')^\mu(p+p')^\nu $$

Expanding the second term in the rhs

$$ L_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} = 2\Big(k'_\mu k_\nu+k'_\nu k_\mu + \frac{1}{2}q^2g_{\mu\nu}\Big) (p^\mu p^\nu + p^\mu p'^\nu + p'^\mu p^\nu + p'^\mu p'^\nu) $$

hence,

$$ L_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} = 2 \Big[ (k' \cdot p)(k \cdot p) + 2 (k'\cdot p)(k \cdot p') + (k' \cdot p')(k \cdot p') + (k' \cdot p)(k \cdot p) + 2 (k'\cdot p')(k \cdot p) + (k' \cdot p')(k \cdot p') + \frac{1}{2}q^2 (p^\mu p^\nu + p^\mu p'^\nu + p'^\mu p^\nu + p'^\mu p'^\nu) \Big] $$
 
  • Like
Likes GW150914
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think Greiner missprint the result. I've finally got the contraction result:

$$ L_{\mu\nu}=8\Big(2(k\cdot p)(k'\dot p)+\frac{1}{2}q^2 M^2\Big) ,$$

and if I use the relativistic limit, my result is confirmed.
 

FAQ: Leptonic-Hadronic Tensor Multiplication Proof with Rest and Final Target Momenta

1. What is the purpose of a Leptonic-Hadronic Tensor Multiplication Proof with Rest and Final Target Momenta?

A Leptonic-Hadronic Tensor Multiplication Proof with Rest and Final Target Momenta is a mathematical proof used in particle physics to calculate the scattering of particles. It helps determine the strength of the interactions between particles and can provide insight into the fundamental forces of nature.

2. How does the Leptonic-Hadronic Tensor Multiplication Proof work?

The proof uses the principles of quantum field theory and Feynman diagrams to calculate the scattering amplitudes of particles. It involves multiplying the leptonic and hadronic tensors, which contain information about the particles' spin and momentum, respectively. The rest and final target momenta are also taken into account to accurately calculate the interactions.

3. What is the significance of including rest and final target momenta in the proof?

Rest and final target momenta are crucial in accurately calculating the interactions between particles. They account for the energy and momentum of the particles before and after the scattering process, which can greatly impact the results. Including these factors in the proof ensures a more precise calculation.

4. How is the Leptonic-Hadronic Tensor Multiplication Proof used in research?

The proof is used extensively in research, particularly in the field of particle physics. It is used to analyze data from particle collisions in experiments such as the Large Hadron Collider. The results obtained from the proof can help researchers understand the fundamental nature of matter and the universe.

5. Are there any limitations to the Leptonic-Hadronic Tensor Multiplication Proof?

Like any scientific method, the proof has its limitations. It is based on certain assumptions and may not accurately represent all interactions between particles. Additionally, it can be computationally intensive and may require simplifications or approximations to be practical in certain scenarios.

Similar threads

Back
Top