Lorentz Transformation in One-Dimensional Space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the applicability of Lorentz transformations in one-dimensional space, specifically questioning whether Einstein's speed of light postulate holds true without additional spatial dimensions. Participants confirm that while the derivation of Lorentz transformations typically requires at least two dimensions, a one-dimensional approach is feasible, as demonstrated in Einstein's "Relativity: The Special and General Theory." The conversation emphasizes the importance of coordinate transformations that maintain the speed of light as constant across different frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations
  • Basic grasp of spacetime concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in one-dimensional space
  • Examine Einstein's "Relativity: The Special and General Theory" for insights on one-dimensional derivations
  • Research the implications of the conformal group in physics
  • Explore the concept of simultaneity in the context of one-dimensional motion
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of spacetime and motion in theoretical physics.

the_emi_guy
Messages
766
Reaction score
79
If space only had one dimension would Einstein's speed of light postulate still lead to Lorentz transformation for motion along that one dimension?
Relativity of simultaneity can obviously be demonstrated in one dimension (lightning bolts hitting opposite ends of stationary and moving train). But all derivations of the Lorentz transformation seem to require at least a second space dimension (i.e. the familiar light clock and Einsteins original 1905 paper) in order to obtain the Lorentz factor. Also, description of light cone:
c2dt2=dx2+dy2+dz2 reduces to
cdt=dx so space-time intervals would no longer have the square roots of squares involved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the_emi_guy said:
But all derivations of the Lorentz transformation seem to require at least a second space dimension
It's easy to do a one-dimensional derivation; there's one by Einstein in the appendix of his book "Relativity: The special and general theory".

Basically we're looking for coordinate transformations such that ##x\pm{c}t=0## implies ##x'\pm{c}t'=0##, which is to say the speed of light is ##c## in both frames.
 
the_emi_guy said:
Also, description of light cone:
c2dt2=dx2+dy2+dz2 reduces to
cdt=dx so space-time intervals would no longer have the square roots of squares involved.
Yes it would. You are missing one root by asserting c dt = dx.
 
Thanks, this is what I was looking for.
 
Nugatory said:
It's easy to do a one-dimensional derivation; there's one by Einstein in the appendix of his book "Relativity: The special and general theory".

Basically we're looking for coordinate transformations such that ##x\pm{c}t=0## implies ##x'\pm{c}t'=0##, which is to say the speed of light is ##c## in both frames.
Then you are let even to a larger group of transformations, namely the whole conformel group!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
902
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K