Lower Limit Topology Clopen Sets

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the lower-limit topology on the real numbers, specifically questioning whether the space (R,T) is connected. The original poster attempts to demonstrate that the existence of a proper subset that is both open and closed indicates disconnection, focusing on the intervals of the form [a,b) and their properties in this topology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the intervals [a,b) being open and closed, with the original poster seeking justification for the closed nature of this interval. There is an exploration of the complements of these intervals and whether they are open in the lower-limit topology.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on expressing the complements of the intervals as infinite unions of basis sets, which may help in establishing their openness. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations and approaches being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions and properties of open and closed sets within the context of the lower-limit topology, as well as the implications of these properties for the connectedness of the space.

tylerc1991
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let T be the lower-limit topology on R. Is (R,T) connected? Prove your answer.

The Attempt at a Solution



Since there exists a proper subset V of R such that V is both open and closed (since all intervals of the form [a,b) are open and closed), then (R,T) is disconnected.

Well, I think I need to provide some justification of why the intervals of the form [a,b) are open and closed: [a,b) is open because it is an element of the basis for the lower limit topology. However, I am not exactly sure of how to go about showing that [a,b) is closed. I was trying to show that it's complement is open, but this didn't exactly get me anywhere. The complement of [a,b) is (-infinity,a) union [b,infinity). I can maybe grasp how [b,infinity) is open because it has the form of an open set in the lower limit topology, but what about (-infinity,a)? Is this open?

Anyway, the question essentially comes down to showing that [a,b) is closed in the lower limit topology. Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show (-infinity,a) and [b,infinity) are infinite unions of basis sets.
 
Dick said:
Show (-infinity,a) and [b,infinity) are infinite unions of basis sets.

(-infinity,a) = U_(n in Z) [a-(n+1),a-n) where U - union, and Z is the set of non-negative integers

[b,infinity) = U_(n in Z) [b+n,b+(n+1)) where U - union, and Z is the set of non-negative integers.
 
tylerc1991 said:
(-infinity,a) = U_(n in Z) [a-(n+1),a-n) where U - union, and Z is the set of non-negative integers

[b,infinity) = U_(n in Z) [b+n,b+(n+1)) where U - union, and Z is the set of non-negative integers.

Sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K