Lunar lander in orbit around the moon and how much work the thrusters do

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work done by the thrusters of a 6000 kg lunar lander transitioning from an 80 km orbit to a 200 km orbit around the moon. The correct approach involves calculating the change in total energy, not just kinetic energy, using the formula W = ΔE = KEf + Uf - (KEi + Ui). The final correct answer for the work done is 5.01 x 10^8 J, achieved by ensuring all radius values are in meters and maintaining consistent units throughout the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (U = GMm/r)
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations (KE = 1/2 mv²)
  • Familiarity with unit conversions, particularly between kilometers and meters
  • Proficiency in applying the work-energy principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy in orbital mechanics
  • Study the work-energy theorem in physics
  • Explore unit conversion techniques for physics calculations
  • Investigate the effects of orbital mechanics on spacecraft trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, aerospace engineers, and anyone involved in spacecraft design or orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

kerbyjonsonjr
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 6000 kg lunar lander is in orbit 80 km above the surface of the moon. It needs to move out to a 200 km -high orbit in order to link up with the mother ship that will take the astronauts home.

How much work must the thrusters do?

Homework Equations



v=\sqrt{}GM/r
W=\DeltaKE
G=6.67 x10-11
Radius of moon= 1,737.4 km
Mass of moon=7.36 x1022

The Attempt at a Solution



Since W=change in KE I figured I would just find the velocity before and after then plug it in. I used v=sqrt GM/r so sqrt 6.67 x10-22* 7.36 x1022/(1737.4+80) and got 51,972.9 m/s and then I did that again with the radius being 1,737.4+200 and got v= 50,337.7 m/s

Then I solved for change in KE=1/2mv2 so 1/2(6000)(50377.72) -1/2(6000)(51972.92) and got -5.02 x1011

I am not sure where I messed up but I know my answer is wrong. Any help would really be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what that negative value means. If it were true, things would not stay in orbit. They would instead spiral outward.

You need to calculate the change in total energy, not just the change in kinetic energy.
 
D H said:
You need to calculate the change in total energy, not just the change in kinetic energy.

Alright, so would I solve for change in E by saying KEf + Uf -(KEi + Ui) ? Is U equal to GMm/r?
 
kerbyjonsonjr said:
Is U equal to GMm/r?
Wrong sign.
 
D H said:
Wrong sign.

Is the rest of the setup though because I am still getting an incorrect answer

I have KEf-GMm/r +(KE2 - GMm/r)

So I put in 1/2(6000)(50,3372) - 6.67 x10^-11(7.36 x10^22)(6000)/(1937)= -7.6 x10^12

Then the other half is 1/2(6000)(519732) -6.67 x10^-11(7.36 x10^22)(6000)/(1817)= -8.1 x10^12

So then that becomes -7.6 x10^12 + 8.1 x10^12 = 5 x10^11

Where did I go wrong?
 
Units! Don't just plug in numbers. You have to make sure that the terms in your expression have consistent units.
 
D H said:
Units! Don't just plug in numbers. You have to make sure that the terms in your expression have consistent units.

Would it be the radius that needs to be in meters? Or is it something else?
 
Yes, the radius needs to be in meters.
 
It would seem as though I am still doing something wrong because I am now getting a negative value again.

I plugged in the value for r in meters my change in energy ended up being
7.58 x10^12 - 8.07 x10^12 which is a negative number. The only thing I did different was plug in the new r values.
 
  • #10
Show your work, with units, not just numbers.
 
  • #11
The final energy: 1/2(6000 kg)(503772 m/s) - 6.67 x 10^-11 (7.36 x10^22 kg)(6000 kg)/(1937000 m) = 7.6 x10^12 - 1.52 x10^10= 7.59 x 10^12

The initial energy: 1/2(6000 kg)(519732 m/s) -6.67 x10^-11 (7.36 x10^22 kg)(6000 kg)/(1817000m)= 8.1 x10^12 - 1.62 x10^10 = 8.08 x10^12

Then I would subtract 7.59 x10^12 - 8.08 x10^12= -4.9 x10^11. I am not sure if I am putting something in incorrectly on my calculator or if I have an error with my units.
 
  • #12
Your velocities are wrong. Show your work, and once again watch your units.
 
  • #13
I finally got it. I forgot to use m for the radius when I calculated the velocities. I redid it and finally got the correct answer of 5.01 x10^8 J. Thank you so much for taking the trouble to help me. I really appreciate it.
 
  • #14
Thanks.

Lesson learned, I hope: Don't just throw numbers around. Always work with units.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K