# What Is the Minimum Velocity Factor for a Lunar Orbit?

• Physgeek64
In summary, the escape velocity for a projectile fired from the surface of the moon can be calculated using the equation ##v=\sqrt{2gR}##, where g is the surface gravity of the moon and R is its radius. To find the minimum value of f for a projectile to go into orbit, the energy required to put the projectile into a circular orbit with radius R must be calculated using the equation ##1/2*m*(fv)^2=GMm/R##, taking into account the projectile's horizontal velocity and the effects of gravity. The projectile must have enough energy to maintain a circular orbit just above the surface of the moon.
Physgeek64

## Homework Statement

Compute the escape velocity for a projectile fired from the surface of the moon.
The moon’s radius is 1700 km, and its surface gravity is ##1.62 m s^(−2)## . Neglect the effect
of the Earth. A second projectile is fired horizontally from the lunar surface with a velocity f times the escape velocity. Find the minimum value of f for the projectile to
go into orbit.

## The Attempt at a Solution

So I have done the first part by simply equating the energy to zero ##1/2*m*v^2 = GMm/R## and noting that ##g=GM/R## its easy to show that ##v=sqrt(2*g*R)##

However, I am confused about the second part since I have not been given a radius of orbit. So my first thought was that the minimum energy of an orbit is a circular orbit, so am I supposed to find the energy required to put the projectile into an orbit of radius R? ##1/2*m*(fv)^2=GMm/R## ?

Many thanks :)

Physgeek64 said:
the minimum energy of an orbit is a circular orbit
Maybe, maybe not. Can you underpin this ? And: if so, is there going to be a transition from the original orbit to this circular orbit ? How can that be organized physically ?

PS Note that I'm not saying your assumption is incorrect...just that you may want to imagine how this minimum speed case comes about; what is (are) the condition(s)

Last edited:
BvU said:
Maybe, maybe not. Can you underpin this ? And: if so, is there going to be a transition from the original orbit to this circular orbit ? How can that be organized physically ?

PS Note that I'm not saying your assumption is incorrect...just that you may want to imagine how this minimum speed case comes about; what is (are) the condition(s)

Well I would suppose that it is the minimum energy since this is when the effective potential its minimum, and is the only orbit that has no component to its radial velocity, whereas every other orbit (which already has a greater ##U_e##) would also gain more energy due to this radial component. Alternatively you can differentiate the orbital equation with respect to r, set the derivative to zero and find that the centripetal force is equal to the gravitational force, and can hence infer circular motion :)
Im not sure- the question wasn't very clear. My problem was that orbits are always closed, so it can't be elliptical since this would cause the projectile to crash back into Earth from its original position. The only other possibility I could think of would be to have a circular orbit in which the projectile is essentially orbiting just above the surface of the moon?

Thank you :)

Think about a projectile fired horizontally at a very low energy, say 1 or 2m/s ... what path does it follow? Where does it end up? Is this an "orbit"?
How about 5 or 6m/s? Where does the projectile end up compared with the first case? Is this an orbit?

Where would the projectile end up for the trajectory to be considered an orbit?

... you may have done this from a different perspective.

Simon Bridge said:
Think about a projectile fired horizontally at a very low energy, say 1 or 2m/s ... what path does it follow? Where does it end up? Is this an "orbit"?
How about 5 or 6m/s? Where does the projectile end up compared with the first case? Is this an orbit?

Where would the projectile end up for the trajectory to be considered an orbit?

... you may have done this from a different perspective.
I would assume it would be the limit for which the projectile just makes it around the earth- i.e. performs circular motion at a radius ever so slightly larger than that of the moon, as I had said. Sorry if I'm missing something obvious :P Many thanks :)

Physgeek64 said:
The only other possibility I could think of would be to have a circular orbit in which the projectile is essentially orbiting just above the surface of the moon?
Sounds reasonable to me: the condition being it doesn't fall faster than at the rate 'the ground curves down'. So, did you manage to convince yourself and can we strike the question mark ?

## What is the purpose of putting a satellite into orbit?

The purpose of putting a satellite into orbit is to gather and transmit important information from space, such as weather patterns, mapping data, and communication signals. Satellites also play a crucial role in scientific research and exploration.

## How is a satellite put into orbit?

A satellite is put into orbit by using a rocket to launch it into space. Once the satellite reaches a certain altitude, it is released and begins to orbit around the Earth due to its own momentum and the gravitational pull of the Earth.

## What factors determine the orbit of a satellite?

The orbit of a satellite is determined by its speed, direction, and altitude. The type of orbit (circular, elliptical, or polar) is also determined by the mission and purpose of the satellite. Other factors, such as the Earth's gravitational pull and atmospheric drag, can also affect the orbit.

## How do scientists control and communicate with satellites in orbit?

Scientists use ground stations and antennas to communicate with satellites in orbit. They can send commands and receive data from the satellite using radio signals. Advanced satellites may also have autonomous systems that allow them to make adjustments and communicate with Earth without human intervention.

## What challenges do scientists face when putting a satellite into orbit?

There are several challenges that scientists face when putting a satellite into orbit. These include the high cost of launching and maintaining a satellite, the risk of launch failures, and the potential for space debris collisions. Scientists must also consider the orbital environment and potential interference from other satellites when planning the orbit for their satellite.

Replies
30
Views
904
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
460
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K