Lyman Alpha Photons in Visible, UV, X-Ray & Gamma Ray Spectra

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaidon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on identifying Lyman alpha photons for hydrogen-like atoms with atomic numbers (Z) greater than one across different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum: visible, UV, X-ray, and gamma-ray. The user applied the formula 1/lambda = (-Ze^2/2ahc)(1/n^2-1/m^2) to calculate the ranges of Z, concluding that no Lyman alpha photons exist in the visible range, while Z must be 12 or lower for the UV range. The user encountered difficulties in determining the ranges for X-ray emissions, suggesting the need for a simpler calculation method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic physics and hydrogen-like atoms
  • Familiarity with the Bohr model of the atom
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic spectrum ranges, specifically visible and UV light
  • Proficiency in unit conversion and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of Lyman series transitions for hydrogen-like atoms
  • Explore the relationship between atomic number (Z) and photon emission in X-ray spectra
  • Study the principles of quantum mechanics as they apply to atomic emissions
  • Investigate alternative methods for calculating photon wavelengths in different spectral regions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of atomic physics, and researchers interested in spectral analysis of hydrogen-like atoms and their emissions across various wavelengths.

jaidon
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Consider the Lyman photons for Hydrogen-like atoms with Z greater than one. Which of these atoms have Lyman alpha photons in the 1)visible 2)UV 3)X-ray and 4)gamma-ray parts of the spectrum? Can list ranges of values of Z in the answers.

My thoughts are to use


1/lambda= (-Ze^2/2ahc)(1/n^2-1/m^2) where a is the Bohr radius and n=2, m=1.

I started by putting in the ranges i know for the different radiations ie) visible ranges from 4000 angstrom to 7000 angstrom, and solving for Z. I got results using this method that say that there are none in the visible range and for the UV, Z= 12 or under. Things are falling apart with the X-ray range which leads me to believe that there is a simpler method.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks


Note: i did make sure that everything was in the appropriate units.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have tried working on this the last few days, but have been unable to decide what is going on. I know there must be an easy way to do this, but for some reason i am stuck. Any help? Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K