A Lyman-Series: calculating the nuclear mass of an isotope

LeoJakob
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Assuming I have a given wavelength λ of the hydrogen spectrum and I want to calculate the nuclear mass of the isotope, is my approach correct?

Rydberg-formula:

$$\frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( \frac{1}{n_1^2} - \frac{1}{n_2^2} \right)$$

with $$R_M = \frac{R_\infty}{1 + \frac{m_e}{M}}$$

Setting ## n_1 = 1 ## and ##n_2 = 2 ##, we get:

$$\frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( \frac{1}{1^2} - \frac{1}{2^2} \right)
\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( 1 - \frac{1}{4} \right)
\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( \frac{3}{4} \right)
\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\lambda} = \frac{3R_M}{4}
\Leftrightarrow R_M = \frac{4}{3\lambda}$$

Substituting ##R_M ##in the definition:

$$\frac{4}{3\lambda} = \frac{R_\infty}{1 + \frac{m_e}{M}}\Leftrightarrow 1 + \frac{m_e}{M} = \frac{3\lambda R_\infty}{4}\Leftrightarrow \frac{m_e}{M} = \frac{3\lambda R_\infty}{4} - 1 \Leftrightarrow M = \frac{m_e}{\frac{3\lambda R_\infty}{4} - 1}$$


Kind regards :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculations look correct to me.

However, your result for the nuclear mass ##M## will probably not be very accurate. The Rydberg formula is only approximate. A full quantum mechanical treatment of the hydrogen atom (including effects of relativity and electron spin) leads to a modification of your result that can be expressed as $$M = \frac{m_e}{\frac{3 \lambda R_{\infty}}{4}(1+\epsilon)-1}$$ where ##\epsilon## is a very small, dimensionless number that comes out of the long, messy calculation. ##\epsilon## is of the order of the square of the fine structure constant ##\alpha##. So ##\epsilon## is of the order of ##10^{-5}##.

At first, you might think that the very small value of ##\epsilon## would not make much difference in the calculation of ##M##. However, the denominator in the expression for ##M## is of the form ##x - 1## where ##x## is a number very close to 1. So, small changes in ##x## can make a big difference in ##M##.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Mordred and LeoJakob
I'm glad you answered I didn't see anything wrong either but I kept second guessing myself so chose to let someone else reply. Glad to see that at least I wasn't incorrect in both the answer and the choice of waiting to see if I was correct.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top