Lyman-Series: calculating the nuclear mass of an isotope

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LeoJakob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotope Mass Nuclear
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the nuclear mass of an isotope using the Rydberg formula, specifically for hydrogen. The formula is expressed as $$\frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( \frac{1}{n_1^2} - \frac{1}{n_2^2} \right)$$ with $$R_M = \frac{R_\infty}{1 + \frac{m_e}{M}}$$. While the initial calculations appear correct, it is noted that the Rydberg formula provides an approximate result. A more accurate calculation requires a quantum mechanical approach that includes a small correction factor $$\epsilon$$, which significantly impacts the final result for the nuclear mass $$M$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Rydberg formula and its application in spectroscopy.
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics, particularly the hydrogen atom model.
  • Knowledge of the fine structure constant $$\alpha$$ and its significance in quantum physics.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills to handle equations involving physical constants.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Rydberg formula and its limitations in precision.
  • Learn about quantum mechanical treatments of the hydrogen atom, including relativistic effects.
  • Research the fine structure constant $$\alpha$$ and its implications in atomic physics.
  • Explore numerical methods for calculating corrections in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers involved in atomic and nuclear physics who are interested in precise calculations of atomic properties.

LeoJakob
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Assuming I have a given wavelength λ of the hydrogen spectrum and I want to calculate the nuclear mass of the isotope, is my approach correct?

Rydberg-formula:

$$\frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( \frac{1}{n_1^2} - \frac{1}{n_2^2} \right)$$

with $$R_M = \frac{R_\infty}{1 + \frac{m_e}{M}}$$

Setting ## n_1 = 1 ## and ##n_2 = 2 ##, we get:

$$\frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( \frac{1}{1^2} - \frac{1}{2^2} \right)
\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( 1 - \frac{1}{4} \right)
\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\lambda} = R_M \left( \frac{3}{4} \right)
\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{\lambda} = \frac{3R_M}{4}
\Leftrightarrow R_M = \frac{4}{3\lambda}$$

Substituting ##R_M ##in the definition:

$$\frac{4}{3\lambda} = \frac{R_\infty}{1 + \frac{m_e}{M}}\Leftrightarrow 1 + \frac{m_e}{M} = \frac{3\lambda R_\infty}{4}\Leftrightarrow \frac{m_e}{M} = \frac{3\lambda R_\infty}{4} - 1 \Leftrightarrow M = \frac{m_e}{\frac{3\lambda R_\infty}{4} - 1}$$


Kind regards :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculations look correct to me.

However, your result for the nuclear mass ##M## will probably not be very accurate. The Rydberg formula is only approximate. A full quantum mechanical treatment of the hydrogen atom (including effects of relativity and electron spin) leads to a modification of your result that can be expressed as $$M = \frac{m_e}{\frac{3 \lambda R_{\infty}}{4}(1+\epsilon)-1}$$ where ##\epsilon## is a very small, dimensionless number that comes out of the long, messy calculation. ##\epsilon## is of the order of the square of the fine structure constant ##\alpha##. So ##\epsilon## is of the order of ##10^{-5}##.

At first, you might think that the very small value of ##\epsilon## would not make much difference in the calculation of ##M##. However, the denominator in the expression for ##M## is of the form ##x - 1## where ##x## is a number very close to 1. So, small changes in ##x## can make a big difference in ##M##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, Mordred and LeoJakob
I'm glad you answered I didn't see anything wrong either but I kept second guessing myself so chose to let someone else reply. Glad to see that at least I wasn't incorrect in both the answer and the choice of waiting to see if I was correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
739
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K