M 8.5 quake S of Japan coming in now

  • Thread starter Thread starter davenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Japan
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a significant earthquake that occurred off the coast of Japan, initially reported as a magnitude 8.5 and later downgraded to 7.8. Participants explore the implications of the earthquake's depth and its potential effects, including the likelihood of a tsunami and surface damage.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the earthquake's depth of nearly 700 km will likely result in a significant lack of surface waves.
  • Others express relief that the earthquake is unlikely to generate a tsunami, emphasizing that Japan does not need another tsunami event.
  • A participant mentions the earthquake has been downgraded to a magnitude of 7.8, suggesting that the magnitude may vary as more data is analyzed.
  • Technical details are provided about the earthquake's location, depth, and tectonic context, including the oblique-normal faulting mechanism and the movement of the Pacific plate.
  • Some contributions highlight that deep-focus earthquakes typically cause less damage on the surface compared to shallow-focus earthquakes, and that large deep-focus earthquakes may be felt at great distances.
  • Reports indicate that the earthquake was powerful enough to cause buildings to sway in Tokyo and disrupt train services, although no tsunami warning was issued due to the earthquake's depth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the earthquake's depth reduces the likelihood of a tsunami and surface damage, but there is no consensus on the implications of the earthquake's magnitude or the extent of its effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the historical context of deep-focus earthquakes and their characteristics, noting that the earthquake's impact may vary based on its depth and location.

davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
11,761
Prelim report

8.5 166km WNW of Chichi-shima, Japan 2015-05-30, 11:23:00 UTC, 696.0 km Deep

http://www.sydneystormcity.com/seismograms.htm

At almost 700km, this extremely deep and will result in a significant lack of surface waves

M8.5 S of Japan.JPG
Dave
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
davenn said:
At almost 700km, this extremely deep and will result in a significant lack of surface waves
That's good. Japan doesn't need another tsunami.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Borg said:
That's good. Japan doesn't need another tsunami.

yup., so true.
its now been downgraded to a M 7.8 ... mag is likely to vary a bit till all the data is analysed
 
M7.8 - 189km WNW of Chichi-shima, Japan
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20002ki3#general_summary
2015-05-30 11:23:02 (UTC)
Lat/Long = 27.831°N 140.493°E
depth = 677.6 km (421.0 mi)
Nearby Cities
  1. 189km (117mi) WNW of Chichi-shima, Japan
  2. 771km (479mi) SSE of Shimoda, Japan
  3. 781km (485mi) SSE of Oyama, Japan
  4. 783km (487mi) SE of Shingu, Japan
  5. 874km (543mi) S of Tokyo, Japan
Tectonic Summary
The May 30, 2015 M7.8 earthquake WNW of Chichi-shima, Japan occurred as the result of oblique-normal faulting at a depth of over 660 km beneath the Pacific Ocean. The earthquake is located within the interior of the Pacific plate that subducts beneath Japan starting at the Izu trench, several hundred kilometers to the east of the event (and at the surface of the Earth). At the location of the earthquake, the Pacific plate moves approximately westwards with respect to the Philippine Sea plate at a rate of 39 mm/yr. This earthquake occurred in response to stresses generated by the slow distortion of the Pacific plate at depth, rather than occurring on the interface between the Pacific plate and the overriding Philippine Sea plate.

Earthquakes that have focal depths greater than 300 km are commonly termed "deep-focus". Deep-focus earthquakes cause less damage on the earth’s surface above their foci than is the case with similar magnitude shallow-focus earthquakes. Large deep-focus earthquakes may be felt at great distance from their epicenters. The largest recorded deep-focus earthquake was a 2013 M 8.3 earthquake that occurred at a depth of 600 km within the subducted Pacific plate beneath the Sea of Okhotsk, offshore northeastern Russia. The M 8.3 Okhotsk earthquake was felt all over Asia, as far away as Moscow, and across the Pacific along the western seaboard of the United States. Over the past century, 66 earthquakes with a magnitude of M7 or more have occurred at depths greater than 500 km; three of these were located in the same region as today's event. The largest nearby event at these depths was a 1968 M 7.3 earthquake, several hundred kilometers to the south of this earthquake.

Very deep means little surface action, or rather the energy is distributed over a larger area of the surface, so a significant tsunami would not be likely.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20002ki3#scientific_origin:us_us20002ki3Powerful quake strikes off Japan; no tsunami warning
http://news.yahoo.com/powerful-quake-strikes-off-japan-no-tsunami-warning-115852201.html
But the temblor was powerful enough to rattle large parts of Japan's main island of Honshu. Buildings swayed in Tokyo — about 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) north of the Ogasawara islands — and stopped some train services in the city. There were reports that parts of the capital were without power.

The meteorological agency did not issue a tsunami warning because the quake struck so far beneath the Earth's surface. Deep offshore earthquakes usually do not cause tsunamis, and generally cause less damage than shallow ones.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K