Machine Design - How To Determine Motor HP Etc.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the appropriate horsepower and gear ratios for a 4-wheel-drive cart designed to haul equipment up and down slopes. Participants explore various aspects of motor specifications, torque requirements, and the implications of using AC versus DC motors for this application.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the specifications of a cart intended for hauling 1500 lb loads up to a 35-degree slope, seeking advice on motor horsepower and gear ratios.
  • Another participant suggests calculating horsepower without considering the slope initially, estimating that approximately 2.7 horsepower would be needed to move the load at 1 meter per second on a flat surface.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of a 1/2 HP motor, particularly regarding its ability to generate sufficient torque to ascend steep slopes.
  • One participant mentions that a gear ratio of 20:1 could yield a reasonable speed for the application but questions whether the motor can provide enough torque to start moving the load on an incline.
  • Another participant emphasizes the inefficiency of using a clutch/brake with an AC motor for variable speed applications and suggests considering a large DC motor instead.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of understanding the relationship between horsepower, torque, and gear ratios, with participants expressing uncertainty about the necessary calculations.
  • Some participants challenge earlier calculations regarding power and force, indicating misunderstandings in the definitions and relationships between these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the suitability of AC versus DC motors, the necessary horsepower for the application, and the calculations involved in determining the required specifications. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions and limitations in their calculations, including the effects of friction, the need for starting torque, and the implications of using different types of motors. There is also mention of potential losses in power transmission through extension cords.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in machine design, particularly those working on electric drive systems for heavy loads or steep inclines, as well as those seeking to understand the relationships between motor specifications and performance in practical applications.

markslife
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am planning a build on a simple 4-wheel-drive cart for hauling equipment for my business up/down yards with grade. 4 wheel cart will have weight capacity 1500 lb with potential of crossing up to 35 degree slope (slow RPM/high torque/motor brake necesary.) This will implement a 110V AC motor/110V motor-brake/gear box to increase torque and slow down RPMs.

1500 lb weight load
35 degrees slope max
110V AC service
15 Amps max
15 RPM roughly final RPM

I do not have an estimate on HP/torque etc to handle this application. I do not have any specific electrical education so layman's terms are appreciated. Looking for input/formulas/advice on how to achieve the proper drivetrain ratings mostly HP, gear ratio, torque.

We happen to have a motor 1/2 HP, 1750 RPM, motor clutch brake, and 20:1 gear ratio, but final RPMs are too fast for the application. (I am assuming a speed control would greatly reduce the torque and capability of this machine.)

Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Newbie here but I'll give you my 2cents:

I would assume do calcs without grade first for simplification:

1 Horsepower is equal to the force needed to move 550lbs 1 meter in one second. So you would need about 2.7 horsepower to move that load (no slope) 1 meter per second (assuming no friction... as if the load was sitting on ice). So your 1/2 HP motor would (theoretically) move that load 1 meter every 5.3 seconds. That's a 1 to 1 gear ratio and assuming the motor can get it moving.

Not sure about torque issues... I think a variac would allow you to slow that motor down but I'm not certain about torque/current draw limitations which might result (I would assume conservation of energy would come into play in any case). Alternatively, changing the gearing would allow that high speed to give you the correct rpm's on the wheel side obviously. So I think you're looking at a first problem of whether or not you'll have the amps to draw to overcome the friction of standstill? And the in-rush current potential of that motor may not have what it takes (likely not). That's where I become unclear. I just haven't studied torque yet myself.

One mechanic or hydraulic horsepower is equal to 745 watts. So you'd need 2013 watts to move it one meter per second. One electrical horsepower is equal to 746 watts, so 1/2 hp more is about 355 watts. Watts are always per second so it would take 355 * x = 1500. That's about 5 seconds (again). Same power/work calculations using watts vs hp.

Usually with a motor like that you need a start capacitor to get the motor going. Perhaps a larger cap there would increase the initial torque into the range you need. There may be a run cap as well you need on the motor. But you're definitely (from my understanding) limited in rpms by the ac frequency, so you'll either need a variac or a gearing.

That's all Iv'e got...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
The typical AC motor like what is in a pump or compressor will not work well for variable speed/load applications. Adding a clutch/brake will mostly just add efficiency losses and not achieve variable speed control either. Having a gear box will allow you to trade some speed for torque and 20:1 puts you at a fair speed with 12” tires (87.5 RPM with a 12” tire is ~275' per minute or ~3MPH which should be a comfortable walking speed). Half a horse is probably not enough for this application, even geared down. The motor is not likely to develop more than a couple ft-lb locked rotor torque. This might get the load going on a flat surface but will not go up a 35 degree slope. On a hard flat surface with no wheel compliance, the force required to get a load moving can be small. For instance, you can push a car that is several thousand pounds with only 40-50 pounds of horizontal force. Once you start getting an angle on it though, the weight of the vehicle really starts to push back. Grade resistance = gross vehicle weight * sin(grade angle). For your 1500 pound vehicle a 10 degree grade angle gives you 260lbs of resistance and 35 degrees gives you 860. You will be drawing about 9amps at the rated load of the motor and a bit more than that when starting so you'll need a hefty power cord to run this at any distance. A 12ga 100' extension cord will loose you about 3 volts at 10 amps. May not seem like much but it's 2.5% lost just in the cord. I'd suggest trying to find a large DC motor and driving you vehicle with batteries if you want to keep it electric.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you two for your input. We currently have a similar small machine with dozer type tracks on it. It will move weight loads greater than 1500 lb at over 45 degrees up. It incorporates a 110V 15 Amp Milwuakee drill "motor" and a gear box with chain drives to one axle and tracks around four guide wheels basically. It is very, very, very slow. This is what inspired my idea for a similar drive system. Simply a high gear reduction with small motor.

Variable speed is not necesary. I don't mind starting with all new drivetrain components. I was just stating the 1/2 HP motor with 20:1 gear was still little too fast I think and I don't know how this converts to pull strength.

My largest need here is to determine:
xHP
xgear ratio
to move my load. I don't know what formula there is for this.
Thanks!
 
Other machine

http://www.forklifttruckmart.co.uk/img/adphotos/705/15705_steprider_photo_0_img.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rp55 said:
Newbie here but I'll give you my 2cents:


1 Horsepower is equal to the force needed to move 550lbs 1 meter in one second.
Careful. Power is not a force.

So you would need about 2.7 horsepower to move that load (no slope) 1 meter per second (assuming no friction... as if the load was sitting on ice).
To maintain the motion of a speeding body on a level frictionless surface requires zero power (assuming negligible air resistance).

Calculations which follow are based on an erroneous understanding so are meaningless.
 
NascentOxygen said:
Careful. Power is not a force.To maintain the motion of a speeding body on a level frictionless surface requires zero power (assuming negligible air resistance).

Calculations which follow are based on an erroneous understanding so are meaningless.
Thanks for the constructive criticism. So I'm curious then since you seem to be in the know:
how many watts would it take to pull that 1500lb load for 1 meter in 1 second with no slope?
 
Last edited:
Actually I would go with DC on this - not AC motors, or is this something that will be plugged in while running? ( would still probably go with DC. If this is a one-off, could probably build with one or two treadmill motors. KISS - also the DC motor has better torque at zero/low speed.

--- http://www.haulzall.com/v/frontend/industrial.htm for some other info on similar items.
 
rp55 said:
how many watts would it take to pull that 1500lb load for 1 meter in 1 second with no slope?
Once you have it up to speed, the only losses after that are those due to friction. So to maintain speed, each second you have to add energy to make up for those losses. If there are no loses, there is no power input required.
 
  • #10
NascentOxygen said:
Once you have it up to speed, the only losses after that are those due to friction. So to maintain speed, each second you have to add energy to make up for those losses. If there are no loses, there is no power input required.

So how many watts to get it up to speed (1 meter per second) for one second?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
58
Views
9K