Maclaurin Series for Expanding sin(2x)^2: Step-by-Step Guide

vabamyyr
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
i have trouble expandind f(x)= (sin2x)^2 into Maclaurin series
for sin(x) Maclaurin series is

\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}

probably the key is to change (sin2x)^2 into new shape. I found that

(sin2x)^2=2sin(2x^2), but that coefficent 2 is bothering me, what to do?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
vabamyyr said:
(sin2x)^2=2sin(2x^2), but that coefficent 2 is bothering me, what to do?
That relation does not hold (the left side is always positive, the right side isn't).

But you can use another identity:

\sin^2 x=\frac{1}{2}(1-\cos 2x)
 
\sin^2 2x=\frac{1}{2}(1-\cos 4x)=0.5-0.5cos4x


and now if i apply for cosx maclaurin series expansion considering the function f(x)= -0,5cos4x i get the right answer but I am puzzled, where does the coefficent 0,5 go? i don't have to count that??
 
Last edited:
The constant term of the series for sin2(2x) is 0.
The 0.5 cancels the -0.5 from the expansion of -0.5*cos(4x).
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top