Magnet Properties: Stick to Steel at 150°C?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bprashant05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ability of magnets to adhere to steel at elevated temperatures, specifically at 150°C. Participants explore the effects of temperature on magnetic properties, including the Curie temperature and the behavior of different magnet materials and types of steel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Prashant Bidikar questions whether magnets can stick to steel at 150°C as they do at normal temperatures.
  • One participant suggests that the ability to stick depends on the specific magnet material and type of steel, estimating a small reduction in force at 150°C for most common magnets, except NdFeB.
  • Another participant discusses the concept of Curie temperature, noting that the flux density of ferromagnets decreases with increasing temperature and that it varies for different materials.
  • There are considerations regarding the magnetization of ferromagnets, indicating that significant reductions in magnetization occur only as temperatures approach the Curie temperature.
  • One participant expresses curiosity about the distribution of electron spins in different magnetic materials and whether they follow a Gaussian distribution.
  • There is a debate about the nature of distributions, with participants discussing whether a distribution can be considered a function and referencing various statistical distributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the effects of temperature on magnet properties, particularly regarding the Curie temperature and the behavior of different materials. There is no consensus on the specifics of how these factors interact.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the Curie temperature and the potential impact of polymeric binders in bonded magnets, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these factors on magnet performance at elevated temperatures.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in magnet properties, materials science, and the effects of temperature on magnetic behavior may find this discussion relevant.

bprashant05
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,

i have question will the magnet be able to stick to the steel ,when steel is at 150 degreee centigrade in same wave as it will stick to it at normail temperature.

Please advice or give me the resourses to find magnet properties.

Thanks
Prashant Bidikar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bprashant05 said:
will the magnet be able to stick to the steel ,when steel is at 150 degreee centigrade in same wave as it will stick to it at normail temperature.
This depends on the specific magnet material and the type of steel. For most common magnets (except NdFeB) and steels, there will be only a small (<20%, would be my guess) reduction in the force at 150C. Most steels have a Curie Temperature of about 500-600C, so I imagine they don't change by much until about 300C or higher. The problem is more with the magnet, and there are two points to consider here:
(i) are we well below the Curie point of the magnetic material, and
(ii) if the magnet is bonded, are we below the safe working temperature of the binder?

At 150C, you can not use an NdFeB magnet, but I think most other kinds will work.

PS: Here's a link that tells you about maximum working temperatures of different magnet types.
http://www.coolmagnetman.com/magcare.htm

Here's a better link:
http://www.stanfordmagnets.com/magnet.html
 
Last edited:
The flux density of a ferromagnet decreases with increasing temperature until a point at which the electron configuration changes, because the molecules have sufficient energy to change configuration at high temp, and the substance becomes paramagnetic. I think its called the Curie temperature, and it varies for different metals/alloys.

So it won't stick to it "in the same way" as in, the magnetic flux will be weaker. But it will still stick to it provided its below the curie temperature.

i think :P
 
3trQN said:
The flux density of a ferromagnet decreases with increasing temperature until a point at which the electron configuration changes, because the molecules have sufficient energy to change configuration at high temp, and the substance becomes paramagnetic. I think its called the Curie temperature, and it varies for different metals/alloys.

So it won't stick to it "in the same way" as in, the magnetic flux will be weaker. But it will still stick to it provided its below the curie temperature.

i think :P
That's pretty close. But there's two points to consider. (i) The magnetization does not typically fall away much until you get close to the Tc, and then it decreases drastically. So, you can often heat a ferromagnet up to about 70% of Tc and see less than a 30% reduction in magnetization (from the 0K value). (ii) However, with most bonded magnets, there's a lower constraint on the working temperature due to the polymeric binder that's used to hold together the particles of the magnet.

A typical magnetization vs temperature curve looks something like this: http://magician.ucsd.edu/sio247/lectures/html/lecture3/lecture322x.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah thanks, i figured it wouldn't be linear but wasnt sure.

Intresting curve profile, does it change considerably for various materials?

How are the electron spins distributed in the three materials (para, dia and ferro) , do any of them follow a gaussian distribution?
 
Last edited:
Distributed as a function of what?
 
Gokul43201 said:
Distributed as a function of what?

A distribution ain't a function!

A distribution is just a record of which values of the variable in question are how probable. Now, the (random - so to say) variable itself could depend on some other parameter - say time. Then the distribution itself becomes a function of time. So at each instant, the snapshot of the distribution could look different.
 
rainbowings said:
A distribution ain't a function!

Why would a distribution not be a function? It is most definitely a function - albeit it may be a non-continuous one.

Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, Planck distribution, radial distribution, etc...these are all functions of a variable (velocity, energy, radial separation, respectively).

A normalized probability distribution is a function that maps some domain to the real interval [0,1]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K