Magnetic field due to a loop within the area of the loop

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field due to a current-carrying loop at a point within the area enclosed by the loop. Participants explore the complexities of the problem, particularly in relation to the Biot-Savart law and the implications of integrating over varying distances from the loop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the Biot-Savart law and express difficulty in formulating the necessary integral. There are questions about whether a closed-form solution exists for the magnetic field at various points within the loop, and some participants express uncertainty about the uniformity of the magnetic field in that area.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest that the magnetic field may not be uniform within the loop, while others question the feasibility of finding a solution. There is acknowledgment of the relationship between magnetic field calculations and inductance, though the focus remains on the magnetic field itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential complexity of the problem due to the need for advanced calculus and the influence of wire radius on the magnetic field. There is also mention of external resources that may provide additional insights into the topic.

Yashbhatt
Messages
348
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


This is a question me and my friend were wondering about. How can one calculate the magnetic field due to a current carrying loop at a point in the area enclosed by the loop.

For example, at point P as shown in the attached figure.

Homework Equations


$$B = \frac{\mu_{0}I[sin\theta_{1}-sin\theta_{2}]}{4\pi(r)}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I feel there are just too many variables to arrive at a solution. Even if we consider it for a point at a fixed distance $x from the center, then too the distance to the loop changes as we integrate. However, I have a feeling that analogous to the shell theorem for gravitation/electrostatics, the field should be the same at every point within the area but I can't prove it.
magfield.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Biot-Savart law. For a general point within the loop's circumference it's indeed difficult to find a closed form expression for the magnetic field.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Use Biot-Savart law. For a general point within the loop's circumference it's indeed difficult to find a closed form expression for the magnetic field.

Yeah. I know I have to use Biot-Savart's Law but I am not able to formulate the integral. Seems more like a question of Mathematics rather than Physics.
 
Yashbhatt said:
Yeah. I know I have to use Biot-Savart's Law but I am not able to formulate the integral. Seems more like a question of Mathematics rather than Physics.
I may be wrong , but I don't think you can find the magnetic field at any general point of a circular loop .
 
Qwertywerty said:
I may be wrong , but I don't think you can find the magnetic field at any general point of a circular loop .
What do you mean by we can't find? There must be some way. Also, I am not talking about just any point. I am talking about a point at a certain fixed distance from the center.
 
Yashbhatt said:
What do you mean by we can't find? There must be some way. Also, I am not talking about just any point. I am talking about a point at a certain fixed distance from the center.
I said there probably might not be a solution , and that I might be wrong . And yes , a general point is referring to the same point you speak of .
 
Qwertywerty said:
I said there probably might not be a solution , and that I might be wrong . And yes , a general point is referring to the same point you speak of .
There is no closed-form solution. B can, aside from the center point, be only approximated. The radius of the wire is also of import. As the wire radius decreases the B field approaches infinity by the wire.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Qwertywerty
Yashbhatt said:
There must be some way
If your problem is for practical purpose, use your computer.
 
IMO the only practical reason for computing B everywhere inside a loop is to find the inductance, since L = φ/i and φ = ∫B⋅dA. If you want inductance there are inductance calculators on the Web. Those formulas too are approximations and they too involve the wire radius in addition to the loop area.
 
  • #10
rude man said:
IMO the only practical reason for computing B everywhere inside a loop is to find the inductance, since L = φ/i and φ = ∫B⋅dA. If you want inductance there are inductance calculators on the Web. Those formulas too are approximations and they too involve the wire radius in addition to the loop area.

No. I don't want inductance. Just the magnetic field.
 
  • #11
Yashbhatt said:
No. I don't want inductance. Just the magnetic field.
I know. But, you can't have it! :frown:
 
  • #12
rude man said:
I know. But, you can't have it! :frown:

Is there any chance that my intuition about it being constant is correct?
 
  • #13
By constant, do you mean constant along the circle of constant radius from the center? If yes, then no, magnetic field doesn't behave exactly like electric field. If your problem has certain symmtery which allows the use of Ampere's law, you can indeed benefit from this symmtery type. Unfortunately, the circular current loop does not satisfy this symmetry required in the application of Ampere's law.

EDIT: in the first sentence it should have been "radius from the center from the wire", i.e. not the center of the loop. The magnetic field should of course be constant along circle of constant radius from the loop center, but it's just almost impossible to find a closed form expression.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
blue_leaf77 said:
By constant, do you mean constant along the circle of constant radius from the center? If yes, then no, magnetic field doesn't behave exactly like electric field. If your problem has certain symmtery which allows the use of Ampere's law, you can indeed benefit from this symmtery type. Unfortunately, the circular current loop does not satisfy this symmetry required in the application of Ampere's law.

EDIT: in the first sentence it should have been "radius from the center from the wire", i.e. not the center of the loop. The magnetic field should of course be constant along circle of constant radius from the loop center, but it's just almost impossible to find a closed form expression.
By constant I mean constant everywhere at every point within the circumference of the loop.
 
  • #15
As I said, the mag field near the loop (wire) is very large, as you can see if you do Biot-Savart on a short arc of the loop very close to that arc so that most of the mag field is due to just the arc and not the rest of the loop. As the wire (not the loop) radius approaches zero the mag field approaches infinity! So no, there is no way you can rationalize that the B field is uniform within the loop area.
I know you're looking for B and not inductance L, but the two are closely related: L = Φ/i and Φ = ∫B(A) dA with i = current. I've shown that L is not exactly computable even with very advanced calculus (elliptical integrals) so it follows immediately that B(A) is in the same boat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77
  • #16
rude man said:
As I said, the mag field near the loop (wire) is very large, as you can see if you do Biot-Savart on a short arc of the loop very close to that arc so that most of the mag field is due to just the arc and not the rest of the loop. As the wire (not the loop) radius approaches zero the mag field approaches infinity! So no, there is no way you can rationalize that the B field is uniform within the loop area.
I know you're looking for B and not inductance L, but the two are closely related: L = Φ/i and Φ = ∫B(A) dA with i = current. I've shown that L is not exactly computable even with very advanced calculus (elliptical integrals) so it follows immediately that B(A) is in the same boat.

Have a look at this article : http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/...ng-2007/class-activities/ch9sourc_b_field.pdfhttp://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/...ng-2007/class-activities/ch9sourc_b_field.pdf

Go to appendix 9.8(Magnetic Field off axis). Is this somehow helpful?
 
  • #17
Look at the sentence below equation (9.8.8), and compare it to what rude man said about the elliptic integral.
Yashbhatt said:
Is this somehow helpful?
Yes, obviously this is helpful as you can directly use (9.8.7) and (9.8.8) along with a computer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K