Magnetic Field Due To Wire Of Semi-Circular Cross Section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field due to a wire with a semi-circular cross-section. The initial approach incorrectly incorporates a volume term, leading to a calculated magnetic field of $$B_{net}=\frac{2\mu_○I}{\pi^2R}$$, which is double the expected value. The correct method involves treating the wire as a semicircular ring with uniform current distribution, where the current density is derived from the current divided by the arc length, not the area. The correct magnetic field calculation requires integrating the contributions of the magnetic field components over the angle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampère's Law and magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration
  • Knowledge of current density and its calculation
  • Concept of magnetic field contributions from current-carrying conductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of magnetic fields from current-carrying wires
  • Study the concept of current density in different geometries
  • Learn about integrating vector fields in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore the application of Biot-Savart Law for magnetic field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electromagnetism and magnetic field calculations related to current-carrying conductors.

Aurelius120
Messages
269
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
An infinite wire has semi-circular cross section with radius R. It carries current I. Then the magnitude of magnetic induction along its axis
Relevant Equations
Field due to infinite wire=##\frac{\mu_○I}{2\pi d}##
1000016287.jpg

I proceeded as follows
Current in sector ##d\theta=## is:
$$dI=\int_{x=0}^{x=R}{\frac{I}{\pi R^2/2}\times\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\times 2\pi x dx}$$
Field due to sector ##d\theta## is therefore
$$dB=\int^{x=R}_{x=0}{\frac{\mu_○}{2\pi x}\times\frac{I}{\pi R^2/2}\times\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\times 2\pi x dx}$$
$$\implies dB=\frac{\mu_○IR}{\pi^2R^2}d\theta$$
1000016289.jpg
For the entire wire:
$$B_{net}=\int^{\pi}_0{dB \cos(\theta-\pi/2) \hat i} + \int^{\pi}_0{dB \sin(\theta-\pi/2) \hat j}$$
Finally$$ B_{net}=\frac{2\mu_○I}{\pi^2R}$$

This is double the correct value? What did I do wrong ? Why does the book give this answer?
1000016289.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what you are doing here: $$dI=\int_{x=0}^{x=R}{\frac{I}{\pi R^2/2}\times\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\times 2\pi x dx}.$$ The semicircular ring of radius ##R## is very thin and there should be no ##\pi R^2## term to consider. Assume that the current is uniformly distributed over the ring. An arc ##ds=R ~d\theta## has current $$dI=\frac{I}{\pi R}ds=\frac{1}{\pi}I~d\theta.$$ Consider that as an infinitely long wire, find the two components of its contribution ##dB_x## and ##dB_y## at the center and integrate over ##\theta##. The vertical component is expected to integrate to zero by symmetry. That's how one adds vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
kuruman said:
I don't understand what you are doing here: $$dI=\int_{x=0}^{x=R}{\frac{I}{\pi R^2/2}\times\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\times 2\pi x dx}.$$ The semicircular ring of radius ##R## is very thin and there should be no ##\pi R^2## term to consider.
The wire has semi-circular cross section. Therefore it has current distributed throughout its volume . It is a half cylinder with area ##\pi R^2/2## so current density is calculate by dividing current by area. So what is wrong with how I did it?
Why are you dividing current with circumference to find current density?
 
Aurelius120 said:
It is a half cylinder
The text says "semicircular ring", so just an arc of negligible width.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
The text says "semicircular ring", so just an arc of negligible width.
So how does that look like?
 
@Aurelius120 (just in case you're still not clear) based on the Post #1 diagram the conductor is shaped like this
gutter.gif

(but infinitely long and made of material of negligible thickness).

The use of the terms 'wire'and 'ring' in the question, is not ideal IMO.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and Aurelius120

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
602
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
911
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K