Magnetic Field of an infinite current-carrying wire at a point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the magnetic field generated by an infinite current-carrying wire. The initial attempt presents a series of equations to derive the magnetic field, but the contributor expresses confusion over the disappearance of certain variables and the integration process. Clarifications are provided regarding the role of the distance variable \( r \) and the differential element \( d\vec{l} \), with emphasis on the importance of maintaining clarity in the mathematical representation. The conversation highlights the need for understanding symmetry in solving such physics problems. Ultimately, the thread underscores the complexities involved in deriving the magnetic field from an infinite wire.
BuggyWungos
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Find the magnetic field strength at point P (illustration below)
Relevant Equations
$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}\times\hat{r}}{r^2}$$
1722637413099.png

My attempt:

$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}r\sin{\theta}}{r^2}$$

$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}\sin{\theta}}{r}$$
$$ \sin{\theta} = \dfrac{y}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}$$

$$ d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}}{r}\dfrac{y}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}$$
$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}y}{r^2}$$


$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Iyd\vec{l}}{r^2}$$



This is what I determined to be the magnetic force at P due to ##d\vec{I}##


$$B(r) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\vec{B}(r)$$


$$B(r) =\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Iyd\vec{l}}{r^2}$$


$$B(r) =\dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Iy\vec{l}}{r^2} \Big|_{-\infty}^{+\infty}$$

I don't think my solution is solvable, it just becomes positive infinity minus negative infinity

My professor had a different solution to ##d\vec{B}(r)##

1722638606476.png


I don't understand where ##r## went and how ##dx## was brought forth in the second step :oldconfused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please fix your LaTeX and make it legible.
BuggyWungos said:
My professor had a different solution to ##d\vec{B}(r)##

View attachment 349372

I don't understand where ##r## went and how ##dx## was brought forth in the second step :oldconfused:
##r## didn't go anywhere. It is still there as ##\sqrt{x^2+y^2}.##
##d\vec l## is an element in the direction of the current. Its magnitude in this case is ##dx##.
 
kuruman said:
Please fix you LaTeX and make it legible.

##r## didn't go anywhere. It is still there as ##\sqrt{x^2+y^2}.##
##d\vec l## is an element in the direction of the current. Its magnitude in this case is ##dx##.
I'm surprised you were able to understand all that before I fixed it.

I understand the second part of your comment, but where is ##\sqrt{x^2+y^2}## in the second step of my prof's solution?

Edit: I would have expected it to end up like ##d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \dfrac{Idx\sin{\theta}}{r}##
 
@BuggyWungos, note that in the expression
##~~~~\dfrac {\mu_0}{4 \pi} \dfrac {I \vec {dl} \times \hat r}{r^2}##
##\hat r## is the unit vector in the r-direction; it’s magnitude is ##1##. Don't confuse it with ##\vec r##.
 
Steve4Physics said:
@BuggyWungos, note that in the expression
##~~~~\dfrac {\mu_0}{4 \pi} \dfrac {I \vec {dl} \times \hat r}{r^2}##
##\hat r## is the unit vector in the r-direction; it’s magnitude is ##1##. Don't confuse it with ##\vec r##.
:bow:
Thank you that's such a silly oversight, I even wrote it as r hat in latex and missed it lol
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top