Magnetic Field Strength: Inverse Proportionality to Square or Cube?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Magnetic field strength diminishes inversely proportional to the square of the distance for monopole fields and inversely proportional to the cube of the distance for dipole fields. Monopole fields are theoretical, as true magnetic monopoles do not exist, while dipole fields are observed in practical applications such as bar magnets and current loops. The distinction between these two types of fields is crucial for understanding magnetic behavior at varying distances. The practical application of these concepts depends on the specific use case and the proximity to the magnet's poles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field concepts, including monopole and dipole fields
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart law
  • Knowledge of magnetic properties of materials, specifically rare Earth magnets
  • Basic physics principles related to distance and field strength
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Biot-Savart law for detailed understanding of magnetic fields
  • Explore the properties and applications of rare Earth magnets with a focus on their Maximum Energy Product
  • Study the differences between monopole and dipole magnetic fields in practical scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of distance on magnetic field strength in various configurations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students interested in magnetism, particularly those studying magnetic field behavior and applications of rare Earth magnets.

magnetics
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I have read a number of journal article that state that magnetic field strength diminishes inversely proportional to the square of the distance. BUT more than one has stated that the field strength is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance from the surface of the magnet.
Which one is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It depends on the source of the field and how close you are to it.

A "monopole" field goes like 1/r^2. Magnetic monopoles don't actually exist as far as we know to date, but some situations can produce a field which is approximately a monopole field over a limited region. For example, if you have a long bar magnet and you stay close to one pole.

A "dipole" field goes like 1/r^3. This is what you get from a current loop or a bar magnet, when you get far enough away that it appears "small."
 


Thank you jtbell, that makes a lot of sense now. Could you possibly point me to a reference book/article that defines this?

Also in practical terms for a permanent magnet, say rare Earth with Max. Energy Product of 40MGOe how long would it have to be before it's capable of taking on the properties of a monopole at each end?
 


dont forget about the magnetic field of a single electron moving through empty space
 


magnetics said:
Thank you jtbell, that makes a lot of sense now. Could you possibly point me to a reference book/article that defines this?

Also in practical terms for a permanent magnet, say rare Earth with Max. Energy Product of 40MGOe how long would it have to be before it's capable of taking on the properties of a monopole at each end?

That tends to be a matter of practical application. To be treated as a monopole, one need only be so close to one pole that the effects from the opposite pole are "negligable." Where that threshold lies is up to the individual and usually dictated by the purpose for which the magnet is being used or examined.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
981
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K