Magnetic flux formula confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The magnetic flux formula is defined as Ø = BAcos(ø) for cases where the angle ø is measured between the magnetic field B and an axis perpendicular to the surface area A. Alternatively, Ø = BAsin(ø) applies when ø is the angle between B and the surface itself. The integral definition of magnetic flux, Φ = ∫_A B_n dA, accounts for varying magnetic fields and surfaces, emphasizing the importance of the angle's definition in determining the correct formula to use. Both formulas are valid under specific conditions, particularly when B is constant and the area is flat.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and integrals
  • Knowledge of the concepts of area and angles in physics
  • Basic grasp of electromagnetic theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integral definition of magnetic flux: Φ = ∫_A B_n dA
  • Learn about the relationship between magnetic fields and angles in electromagnetic applications
  • Explore the implications of varying magnetic fields on magnetic flux calculations
  • Investigate practical examples of magnetic flux in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetism, and professionals working in fields related to electrical engineering and magnetic field applications.

sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone,

In the magnetic flux formula in our textbook it says Ø = BAcosø and somewhere else I saw it as Ø=BAsinø. I don't know which one to use. If F=BIL sinø
why does magnetic flux have cos in it formula. If something is perpendicular don't we have to use sine. Any help would be apppreciated. Thanks:smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
formula \phi = BAcos\alpha is magnetic flux
it like \phi=\oint<b>E</b>d<b>A</b>
formula F=ILBsin\alpha was deduced from F=qvB or F=qvbsin\alpha
 
Last edited:
sameeralord said:
Hello everyone,

In the magnetic flux formula in our textbook it says Ø = BAcosø and somewhere else I saw it as Ø=BAsinø. I don't know which one to use. If F=BIL sinø
why does magnetic flux have cos in it formula. If something is perpendicular don't we have to use sine. Any help would be apppreciated. Thanks:smile:

Those 2 formulas might both be fine, it just depends on how is the angle ø defined.

They are however just special cases, when the area considered is flat and B is constant.

The real definition of magnetic flux, which is valid for every surface and in every case, is:

\Phi = \int_A B_n dA

which means that you have to sum (integral) the contributes of the perpendicular (normal) component of B in every point of the surface A.

When B is constant everywhere (does not vary in different points of the surface) and A is flat, the integral goes away and the normal component of B is Bcosø if ø is defined as the angle between B and an axis perpendicular to A (or Bsinø if ø if the angle between B and the surface A).
 
Domenicaccio said:
Those 2 formulas might both be fine, it just depends on how is the angle ø defined.

They are however just special cases, when the area considered is flat and B is constant.

The real definition of magnetic flux, which is valid for every surface and in every case, is:

\Phi = \int_A B_n dA

which means that you have to sum (integral) the contributes of the perpendicular (normal) component of B in every point of the surface A.

When B is constant everywhere (does not vary in different points of the surface) and A is flat, the integral goes away and the normal component of B is Bcosø if ø is defined as the angle between B and an axis perpendicular to A (or Bsinø if ø if the angle between B and the surface A).

I got it. You are right it depend on the angle they give. Thanks a lot :smile:.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K