Magnetic Flux: Why Does it Stay the Same?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux remains consistent in both coils of a transformer due to the magnetic core's ability to contain and couple the flux into the windings, leveraging its high permeability. However, some flux may leak out, and there is always a small amount of magnetizing current in the primary coil that does not couple to the secondary. For basic analysis, these leakage effects can often be disregarded, but they are significant for detailed magnetic design considerations. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these principles in transformer design. Overall, the magnetic core plays a crucial role in maintaining effective flux coupling.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
The resistance of the primary coil of a well-designed, 1 : 10 step-down transformer is 1 Ω. With the secondary circuit open, the primary is connected to a 12V ac generator. The primary current is:

A. essentially zero
B. about 12A
C. about 120A
D. depends on the actual number of turns in the primary coil
E. depends on the core material

The answer key says A.
Relevant Equations
Φ = NBA = N ( μ0*n*i)A
I calculated in this way as attached and got the correct answer. However I still wonder why the magnetic flux is the same in both coils, or this presumption is not right.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 269
Physics news on Phys.org
In a well designed (simple) transformer the magnetic core's job is to contain almost all of the flux and couple it into all of the windings. This works because it has very high permittivity permeability compared to air (or other non-magnetic things).

However, in practice, some of the flux in each winding "leaks" out and isn't coupled to other windings. Also, there is always at least a little bit of current flowing in the primary that isn't coupled to the secondary, we call that the magnetizing current. That's why choice A says "essentially zero". For simple, first order analysis, you can ignore these effects. But often magnetics designers care a lot about them for esoteric reasons.

edit: Oops! Big mistake it's permeability, not permittivity, not at all the same thing, LOL.
 
Last edited:
DaveE said:
In a well designed (simple) transformer the magnetic core's job is to contain almost all of the flux and couple it into all of the windings. This works because it has very high permittivity compared to air (or other non-magnetic things).

However, in practice, some of the flux in each winding "leaks" out and isn't coupled to other windings. Also, there is always at least a little bit of current flowing in the primary that isn't coupled to the secondary, we call that the magnetizing current. That's why choice A says "essentially zero". For simple, first order analysis, you can ignore these effects. But often magnetics designers care a lot about them for esoteric reasons.
I got it. Thank you so much.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top