Magnetic Flux: Why Does it Stay the Same?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux remains consistent in both coils of a transformer due to the magnetic core's ability to contain and couple the flux into the windings, leveraging its high permeability. However, some flux may leak out, and there is always a small amount of magnetizing current in the primary coil that does not couple to the secondary. For basic analysis, these leakage effects can often be disregarded, but they are significant for detailed magnetic design considerations. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these principles in transformer design. Overall, the magnetic core plays a crucial role in maintaining effective flux coupling.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
The resistance of the primary coil of a well-designed, 1 : 10 step-down transformer is 1 Ω. With the secondary circuit open, the primary is connected to a 12V ac generator. The primary current is:

A. essentially zero
B. about 12A
C. about 120A
D. depends on the actual number of turns in the primary coil
E. depends on the core material

The answer key says A.
Relevant Equations
Φ = NBA = N ( μ0*n*i)A
I calculated in this way as attached and got the correct answer. However I still wonder why the magnetic flux is the same in both coils, or this presumption is not right.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 271
Physics news on Phys.org
In a well designed (simple) transformer the magnetic core's job is to contain almost all of the flux and couple it into all of the windings. This works because it has very high permittivity permeability compared to air (or other non-magnetic things).

However, in practice, some of the flux in each winding "leaks" out and isn't coupled to other windings. Also, there is always at least a little bit of current flowing in the primary that isn't coupled to the secondary, we call that the magnetizing current. That's why choice A says "essentially zero". For simple, first order analysis, you can ignore these effects. But often magnetics designers care a lot about them for esoteric reasons.

edit: Oops! Big mistake it's permeability, not permittivity, not at all the same thing, LOL.
 
Last edited:
DaveE said:
In a well designed (simple) transformer the magnetic core's job is to contain almost all of the flux and couple it into all of the windings. This works because it has very high permittivity compared to air (or other non-magnetic things).

However, in practice, some of the flux in each winding "leaks" out and isn't coupled to other windings. Also, there is always at least a little bit of current flowing in the primary that isn't coupled to the secondary, we call that the magnetizing current. That's why choice A says "essentially zero". For simple, first order analysis, you can ignore these effects. But often magnetics designers care a lot about them for esoteric reasons.
I got it. Thank you so much.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top