Magnetic Flux: Why Does it Stay the Same?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux remains consistent in both coils of a transformer due to the magnetic core's ability to contain and couple the flux into the windings, leveraging its high permeability. However, some flux may leak out, and there is always a small amount of magnetizing current in the primary coil that does not couple to the secondary. For basic analysis, these leakage effects can often be disregarded, but they are significant for detailed magnetic design considerations. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these principles in transformer design. Overall, the magnetic core plays a crucial role in maintaining effective flux coupling.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
The resistance of the primary coil of a well-designed, 1 : 10 step-down transformer is 1 Ω. With the secondary circuit open, the primary is connected to a 12V ac generator. The primary current is:

A. essentially zero
B. about 12A
C. about 120A
D. depends on the actual number of turns in the primary coil
E. depends on the core material

The answer key says A.
Relevant Equations
Φ = NBA = N ( μ0*n*i)A
I calculated in this way as attached and got the correct answer. However I still wonder why the magnetic flux is the same in both coils, or this presumption is not right.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 268
Physics news on Phys.org
In a well designed (simple) transformer the magnetic core's job is to contain almost all of the flux and couple it into all of the windings. This works because it has very high permittivity permeability compared to air (or other non-magnetic things).

However, in practice, some of the flux in each winding "leaks" out and isn't coupled to other windings. Also, there is always at least a little bit of current flowing in the primary that isn't coupled to the secondary, we call that the magnetizing current. That's why choice A says "essentially zero". For simple, first order analysis, you can ignore these effects. But often magnetics designers care a lot about them for esoteric reasons.

edit: Oops! Big mistake it's permeability, not permittivity, not at all the same thing, LOL.
 
Last edited:
DaveE said:
In a well designed (simple) transformer the magnetic core's job is to contain almost all of the flux and couple it into all of the windings. This works because it has very high permittivity compared to air (or other non-magnetic things).

However, in practice, some of the flux in each winding "leaks" out and isn't coupled to other windings. Also, there is always at least a little bit of current flowing in the primary that isn't coupled to the secondary, we call that the magnetizing current. That's why choice A says "essentially zero". For simple, first order analysis, you can ignore these effects. But often magnetics designers care a lot about them for esoteric reasons.
I got it. Thank you so much.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top