Magnetic vector potential of a moving current sheet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the magnetic vector potential, ##\vec{A}##, for a moving current sheet using cylindrical coordinates. The integral derived is $$\vec{A} = \frac{\mu_0 \sigma_0 v }{2} ct \ U(t-\frac{|z|}{c}) \hat{x}$$, which indicates that the potential increases indefinitely as time progresses. The contributors highlight that the resulting magnetic field is zero almost everywhere, except for potential delta functions due to the step function. The importance of the contribution from the lower limit of the integral, specifically at ##r = 0##, is emphasized as crucial for determining the behavior of the magnetic field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector potentials in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of the unit step function, ##U(x)##
  • Basic principles of magnetic fields generated by current distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the magnetic vector potential in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the implications of the unit step function in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the behavior of magnetic fields generated by moving charge distributions
  • Investigate the convergence issues in integrals involving infinite current distributions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in the dynamics of magnetic fields and vector potentials in moving systems.

Decimal
Messages
73
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
A uniformly charged infinite sheet in the x-y plane starts moving with velocity ##v## in the x direction at time ##t=0##. The spatial charge distribution is then ##\rho(\vec{r}) = \sigma_0 \delta(z)##. The current density for ##t>0## is then ##\vec{J} = \sigma_0 v \delta(z) \hat{x}##.

Calculate the retarded vector potential a distance ##z## above the moving sheet for ##t>0##.
Relevant Equations
##\vec{A} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \int \frac{\vec{J}(\vec{r}', t_r)}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} d^3r'. ## Here ##t_r## is the retarded time and ##r## the distance to the observation point
Hello,

I start by applying the integral for the vector potential ##\vec{A}## using cylindrical coordinates. I define ##r## as the distance to the ##z##-axis. This gives me the following integral,$$\vec{A} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \sigma_0 v 2 \pi \hat{x} \int_0^{\sqrt{(ct)^2-z^2}} \frac{r}{\sqrt{r^2+z^2}} dr.$$ Here I have adjusted my integration boundary such that only the current which actually influences the observation point influences the potential. Obviously this boundary increases with time.

The above integral gives the following result, $$\vec{A} = \frac{\mu_0 \sigma_0 v }{2} ct \ U(t-\frac{|z|}{c}) \hat{x}.$$ Here I have defined ##U(x)## as the unit step function, since ##\vec{A} = 0## if ##t<\frac{|z|}{c}##. Now I am not sure if this is a correct result. On one hand it implies that the potential increases to infinity as ##t \rightarrow \infty##, instead of reducing to the static result. I know that in the static case using the above integral for infinite current distributions doesn't converge anyway, but I don't see a different way of finding the retarded potential for this set-up.

Also with this this vector potential the resulting magnetic field is 0 almost everywhere, except for maybe some delta functions that originate from the step function. This is because ##\vec{A}## is mostly rotationless. This also seems weird to me, and again does not correspond with the static case.

So I feel like I am either starting with the wrong formula entirely or missing some important part of the problem. Any help would be very much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a nonzero contribution from the lower limit (##r = 0##) of the integral. Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. The contribution at the lower limit will affect whether or not you get B = 0 at most points.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Decimal
TSny said:
There is a nonzero contribution from the lower limit (##r = 0##) of the integral. Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. The contribution at the lower limit will affect whether or not you get B = 0 at most points.

Wow yes you're absolutely correct, I completely looked over that term. Thanks a lot for the help! This makes everything much more logical.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K