Magnitude and angle of an electric field vector

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the magnitude and angle of an electric field vector derived from a given electric potential function in an xy plane. The potential is expressed as V = (1.5 V/m²)x² - (2.9 V/m²)y², and the specific point of interest is (3.9 m, 2.9 m).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the electric field components based on the potential's derivatives and the application of the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude. There are questions regarding the correct determination of the angle using the arctan function, particularly in relation to quadrant placement and the signs of the components.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the arctan function and the importance of considering the signs of the components to determine the correct quadrant for the angle. There is recognition of the ambiguity in angle determination, with suggestions to use graphical methods or specific calculator functions to clarify the angle's placement.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the correct interpretation of the angle in relation to the x-axis, with participants exploring different angle representations and their implications for the problem at hand.

Jrlinton
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The electric potential at points in an xy plane is given by V = (1.5 V/m2)x2 -(2.9 V/m2)y2. What are (a) the magnitude of the electric field at the point (3.9 m, 2.9 m) and (b) the angle that the field there makes with the positive x direction.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, Part a I have completed correctly by multiplying the derivative of the difference potential and the negative of direction component for both x and y.
So for x we get
1.5*-2=-3(x)
And y
2.9*-2=-5.8(y)
Inserting the given values for x and y I get that
x=-11.7
y=-16.82
Using pythagorean theorem I get that
r=20.4891 V/m

The problem I have (and feel silly about) is coming up with the angle in part b
I think it should simply be:
arctan(-16.82/-11.7)+180°
=235.178° or -124.823° ⇐This was incorrect
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jrlinton said:
2.9*-2=-5.8(y)
It is -(2.9 V/m2)y2, not +(2.9 V/m2)y2
 
The arctan function can't tell what signs are associated with the numerator and denominator of the argument that you pass to it, so it can't sort out the right quadrant for the angle by itself. That's up to you. Sketch the vector using the x and y components to find the right quadrant and then adjust the arctan result accordingly.

Alternatively, some calculators provide an atan2(y,x) function that deals with the signs of the arguments for you and correctly places the angle. Others provide rectangular to polar conversion that essentially do the same thing for the angle part of the conversion.
 
gneill said:
The arctan function can't tell what signs are associated with the numerator and denominator of the argument that you pass to it, so it can't sort out the right quadrant for the angle by itself. That's up to you. Sketch the vector using the x and y components to find the right quadrant and then adjust the arctan result accordingly.

Alternatively, some calculators provide an atan2(y,x) function that deals with the signs of the arguments for you and correctly places the angle. Others provide rectangular to polar conversion that essentially do the same thing for the angle part of the conversion.
That is all true, but the ambiguity is a rotation through 180 degrees. In the present problem, jr has a result in the third quadrant when it should be in the second.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gneill
gneill said:
The arctan function can't tell what signs are associated with the numerator and denominator of the argument that you pass to it, so it can't sort out the right quadrant for the angle by itself. That's up to you. Sketch the vector using the x and y components to find the right quadrant and then adjust the arctan result accordingly.

Alternatively, some calculators provide an atan2(y,x) function that deals with the signs of the arguments for you and correctly places the angle. Others provide rectangular to polar conversion that essentially do the same thing for the angle part of the conversion.
I understand that the function cannot determine the quadrant of the angle and just assumes that it is in the first two quadrants. I also understand that this particular would be in the third quadrant.
upload_2017-2-14_18-16-10.png
I suppose that what I am having trouble with is if it is asking for θ being the blue, yellow or orange angle. I understand that using the arctan function will only give me the absolute value of the purple angle of 55.2° to the x axis. It would actually be -55.2° to the axis. So correct me if I am wrong but each angle above would be:
θorange=180+55.2=235.2°
θyellow=-124.2°
θblue=55.2°
 
Thanks haruspex. I missed that negative sign.
 
haruspex said:
That is all true, but the ambiguity is a rotation through 180 degrees. In the present problem, jr has a result in the third quadrant when it should be in the second.
Thanks. I jumped to a conclusion before confirming the reason for jumping! :smile:

I see the underlying issue now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K