Magnitude of force acting on wedge and block

AI Thread Summary
If the force F equals zero and the tangent of the angle theta exceeds the static friction coefficient mu_s, the block will slip due to the inequality f_s > mu_s n. A minimum force directed to the right, calculated as (tan(theta) - mu_s)/(1 + mu_s tan(theta))(M + m)g, prevents slipping. The discussion raises questions about the interpretation of multiple options being valid, suggesting ambiguity in the problem statement. The reasoning appears sound, but the clarity of the maximum and minimum force conditions is questioned. Overall, the analysis highlights the complexities of static friction and force interactions in this scenario.
dl447342
Messages
28
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
A block of mass m sits on a wedge of mass M, which is free to move along a horizontal surface with negligible friction. The coefficient of static friction between the block and the wedge is ##\mu_s##. A horizontal force of a magnitude ##F## pulls on the wedge, as shown in the attached diagram. When ##\tan \theta > \mu_s##, which of the following are true:

A) The force F must be directed to the right with a minimum magnitude.

B) The force F must be directed to the right with a maximum magnitude.

C) The block will slip even if ##F=0##.
Relevant Equations
Newton's second laws are crucial here. From drawing a free-body diagram, one can deduce that the static friction force ##f_s## satisfies ##f_s = m(g\sin \theta +\frac{F}{M+m} \cos\theta) \leq \mu_s m(g\cos\theta - \frac{F}{m+M} \sin\theta)## and that the required maximum force is ##\frac{\mu_s -\tan\theta}{1+\mu_s \tan\theta}(M+m)g ## (I'm stating this because the key part of this question is to determine which of the three statements are correct; I've already figured out the free-body diagrams and Newton's equations).
Clearly if ##F = 0## and ##\tan\theta > \mu_s##, then using the above equations for ##f_s## and ##n##, we get ##f_s > \mu_s n## so the block will slip. However, it seems that as long as the force ##F## is directed to the right with a certain minimum magnitude, namely ##\frac{\tan\theta - \mu_s}{1+\mu_s \tan\theta}(M+m)g##, the block won't slip.

Is this reasoning right?
 

Attachments

  • wedge.png
    wedge.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 163
Physics news on Phys.org
You have only considered one direction of slip, but I agree with your result.
Are you allowed to choose more than one option? It does say "are true", not "is true".
If it is supposed to be only one, I suspect it was intended to state the inequality the other way around.
 
Last edited:
Those maximum and minimum magnitudes seem ambiguous as a question.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top